Available READINGS

Email Readings
1 Question $20 USD
3 Questions $50 USD
6 Questions $80 USD
8 Questions $100 USD
(recent picture required)
Payable in advance by Paypal.

Send payment to cdreadings@aol.com.
At Paypal.com they walk you through the process.
Readings take approx 48 hours
(Expect Sundays)

Friday, May 6, 2016

Oh the FIBS ..

So Janet Jackson and her Hubby Wissam Al Mana.
Are claiming that they are pregnant,
 with her  1st child.
(HA HA).
Odd this really when she was planning,
 a World Tour.
Then oops, she's pregnant.
Yeah right.
I wonder how they are going to explain theappearance of the "BABY"


Anonymous said...

Janet, what have you done for me lately, since you are in control? Did your spouse give you the pleasure principle or a surrogate? Ticket sales are like love; it will never do without you.

T. W. said...

Wow, this tea is hot! Thank you for confirming the secret child rumors.

Anonymous said...

I cant believe she is not pregnant. I think you may be wrong about this, Christian.

Anonymous said...

A baby will magically appear! From under a cabbage leaf, or from a stork.

Develyn Quinn said...

It's so funny that anon. at 3:41am said that lmao!!!

My response would be, "I'm a psychic soooo" ... you know, the guy from state farm commercial having a late night call as his wife walks in Lmao hahahahhahahah

Here's the link---- anonymous3:41 Is the woman Lmao


cecilia bryant said...

CD, you got a "Told Ya" about Kristen Stewart and her girlfriend.

Common Sense said...

She is 49 years old and has a one in a million chance of ever getting pregnant. Unreal that they would try to scam people by saying their pregnant instead of just cancelling the tour. But I also am somewhat surprised that tickets were not selling. I thought people could not get enough of the Jacksons.

Anonymous said...

I don't understand how this can be the first? And if she can be outted as being NOT PREGNANT, why isn't it being cleared that she isn't the mother of the Renee person?

And Clinton with Danny? Why so much denial of your own children?

Anonymous said...

Wow! I always thought the news that she was "working on a family" and that she was suddenly "preggers" just didn't sound or feel quite right. I never figured Janet as a woman who wanted kids. She just doesn't have that maternal vibe to her. Maybe because of her turbulent upbringing. That would be incredibly sad if this is a contrived lie to save face over poor ticket sales. But, it happens in show biz.

Alex Stay said...

This can only go two ways. They announce she has had a miscarriage or baby will appear from somewhere.

chris said...

I read somewhere that She's covering up another big secret. Here is a recent blind item on this exact situation...
Our former A+ lister had multiple talents and didn’t need to be in the public eye to make a fortune. She would show up when needed, but for the most part, she could live her life the way she chose and still be an A+ lister. Way back in the day when she was first becoming known she had a child. For those of you who read blogs or devote a lot of time to gossip, you probably know, or at least have heard about this child. For the vast majority of the population who only get their celebrity news from the glossy weekly tabloids, they have no clue. For decades this child has been a secret to the general public. The child, hidden away among all the other family members was allowed to live her life away from the spotlight. The child grew up and now, is pregnant. The pregnancy has been kept secret. The family is almost as good as our celebrity about keeping secrets. The father of the soon to be baby has received a very very large check to relinquish his parental rights and signed a lengthy non disclosure agreement. Nothing will ever be heard from him again. Ever. That is the way our former A+ lister handles things. Money talks and people walk away. In the not too distant future, our celebrity will come forth bearing this baby in her arms and declaring to the world that the baby is hers. It is a way to perpetuate the secret. It is also in a way, allowing the celebrity to raise a child in public which she did not do in the past. Janet Jackson

Anonymous said...

It's kind of sad that she is going to "use" her grandchild to play the part of her child. Her daughter doesn't have a problem with this? I would. Just sayin'....

T. W. said...

Dwh is that you?

Anonymous said...

That's some pretty weird s*#% ! Lol Even for this site. : D

Maria said...

WTH is the matter with this WEIRD family! They are exhausting with their constant games, politics, lies and trickery. It's not even amusing, it's just pointless and ridiculous. Retire already, Janet. BYE

Anonymous said...

Wow that is weird. I just read an article about how she deceived her former husband James Debarge. Is she really going to get away with doing that to him and then get her grandchild (and his) and perpetuate this fraud? It's so sick. Say she won't get away with it, C.D. It is too sick what she did to her ex.