Skip to main content

TOLD Ya..

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/meghan-markle-accused-of-extremely-disappointing-ripoff/news-story/db3601b2b17f1b6a51dece3d1955ea8a

Won't go down well.....

WTF.......
Will she ever learn.
1. Royals don't have side jobs.
2. She left off "Lillibet".
3. It's a copy of another front page.
4. It's crap..
5. She better not drive in one of Philips cars.

Comments

Melic21 said…
I hope these women sue! This just shows how in her own world Me Ghan is in
Letty said…
The royals are probably planning how to get rid her
Sooner or later she will be gone/sacrificed like Diana

It will be another accident for the world to mourn!
T. W. said…
I agree, there is nothing unique about that cover. I get a lot of magazines in the mail. Creativity is dead.


The blind item site claims Me Again had very little control over who appeared on the cover and the content of the article(s).

While I agree Me Again is a headache for the royal family, I still believe she is being used as scapegoat/sacrificial lamb. Prince Andrew is overjoyed...
T. W. said…
Jeffrey Epstein News:


1. Today's Blind Items - The Birthday Gift


https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/07/todays-blind-items-birthday-gift.html?m=1



2. Blind Items Revealed #3


https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/07/blind-items-revealed-3_30.html?m=1


3. WARNING: Link NSFW

Meet Nadia Marcinkova, Star Girl of the Raunchiest Part of Epstein Scandal


https://dealbreaker.com/2006/07/meet-nadia-marcinkova-star-girl-of-the-raunchiest-part-of-epstein-scandal



More to come...
T. W. said…
Follow up as promised. The article also contains photos, various links, and a link to drone footage of Epstein's private island. The article is juicy & connects the dots. Here's a taste:


Jeffrey Epstein: The True Ugly Face of the Occult Elite

[...]

The fact that a “temple” was built on an island known for extreme depravity is disturbing. However, when one fully understands the mindset of the occult elite, it makes perfect sense. It is all about symbolism and ritual.

For instance, the “temple” has a striking resemblance with Hammam Yalbugha – a Mamluk-era public bath located in Syria.


Why did Epstein model his “temple” on this specific building? Because of the symbolism attached to it. Indeed, the hammam is a classic example of architecture from the Mamluk era. In Arabic, the word “mamluk” literally means “property” and is used to designate slaves.


During the Mamluk era, children were captured by the ruling class to become slaves. Boys were usually trained to become soldiers while girls were groomed to become the personal concubines of their masters. Considering the fact that Epstein island was used to import child sex slaves for the elite, the symbolism is perfectly fitting.


In order to give the “temple” an unmistakeable occult dimension, the building was adorned with golden statues representing gods (Neptune) and owl-like birds. The building is also surrounded by maze-like patterns, similar to those found in Islamic architecture.



https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/jeffrey-epstein-the-true-ugly-face-of-the-occult-elite/
T. W. said…
Speaking of thieves:

1. Jury finds Katy Perry copied Christian rapper’s song; Damages phase begins in copyright case


"This was a case about taking," Gray's attorney, Michael Kahn, said in his closing argument Thursday. "The defendants copied an important part of (Gray's) song."

But Perry's lawyer, Christine Lepera, said the electronic beat is so "commonplace" that it cannot be copyrighted.

"It is commonplace expression," she said, adding that the "unremarkable" beat in Gray's song is the only element the two tracks have in common.

"There is no reasonable basis to assume" Perry and her collaborators ever heard "Joyful Noise," Lepera said. But the judge disagreed.

U.S. District Judge Christina Snyder wrote that the plaintiff proved his case and he was entitled to a trial because the Grammy-Nominated "Joyful Noise" achieved critical success and was readily available and viewed millions of times on YouTube and MySpace."


http://sandrarose.com/2019/07/jury-finds-katy-perry-copied-christian-rappers-song-damages-phase-begins-in-copyright-case/



2. Katy Perry's "Dark Horse" Copied Christian Rap Song, Jury Finds


"At trial, both Perry and Luke insisted they had never heard of "Joyful Noise," while Gray pointed to his song's success in a niche market. He offered the theory that the defendants may have heard it at the Grammy Awards or seen it on YouTube or MySpace, where the song was played millions of times. The defendants also attempted to knock the plaintiff's ownership of infringing material by pointing to how the beat was allegedly preexisting material. Finally, Perry and Luke called experts to the witness stand in an effort to show a lack of any substantial similarity of protected expression.

The trial had unexpected moments, from Perry offering to perform her hit live amid difficulties with the courtroom sound system, to a shooting that took place just outside the courthouse on the day Dr. Luke testified."


https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/katy-perrys-dark-horse-copied-christian-rap-song-jury-finds-1227297



3. A Judge Has Found That Katy Perry’s “Dark Horse” Ripped Off A Christian Rap Song

"[...] Also, Katy’s song is ten BPM slower in tempo and one step higher in pitch. But it’s close enough that a judge and a jury could get involved, and they did."


https://dlisted.com/2019/07/30/a-judge-has-found-that-katy-perrys-dark-horse-ripped-off-a-christian-rap-song/
CyndiTx123 said…
Can we have any positive stories about Me gain? I am tired of the negative write ups on her. She just had a baby. She is trying to figure out where she belongs within this family unit by doing things not common from royalty. Everything she does is not proper. Tired of of the negativity. Sending love and hope that she knows her place and is a good mom to her new baby and is good to Harry. It's like she has no one on her side. I know when you have a new born, depression can set in. Feeling she is experiencing that for sure.
T. W. said…
CyndiTx123, you hit the nail on the head. All the published reports about Duchess Meghan have been negative.


If anyone finds positive reports & posts links here I would be happy to read them and comment.
Chick'sOpinion said…
CyndiTx123

I understand how you feel about the negativity around Meghan Markle.

Like alot of people. I'm in the middle about her. Plenty are. It's just that shes so famous. People get extreme in their views.

I'm keen about her activism around women's issues. And am concerned she's using the wrong people to promote it. Vogue Magazine is not right to me.

Only rich people read it as a rule. Or fashionisters. Of all types.

The question is. Is Meghan Markle really doing things that much different to other Royals?

If you look closely. Not hugely.
Prince Charles campaigns all the time.... for Environmental issues. Always has. Since the 80's.

Princess Ann Campaigns for issues for Scotland.
Very quietly.
The Duke Of York, Prince Andrew campaigns for British Business. Very quietly.

Meghan is a new Royal. Is pretty. An American, Married a well known Royal.

She has too much media attention for the Monarchy. They don't like it. Plus shes an outsider in many way. She's not even British.

So the Royal family expect her to be quiet. And private. I guess they would see her behavior as impertinent.

I think she would have been more successful as a campaigner. Like Prince Charles. If she had disappeared to privacy. After her wedding.

And began her campaigning 2 years later.

She would have been taken more seriously. And seen as NOT exploiting her position as a Royal. To be political.

Because especially with the UK public. They would then be convinced she has had full consultation with the Queen.. on her campaign. And permission.

There is also suspicion about Meghan because she is an actress. So there's an assumption by the British public and Royal family...that she just loves publicity. And glamorous attention.

The British public are not used to their Royals marrying actresses. Having affairs with them yes.
Not marrying them.
They marry aristocrats. Who understand Royal behaviour to the core. What not to do.
Who not to be seen with.
Aristocrats dont just mix with anyone anyway.
Chick'sOpinion said…
TW

Agree. It's not a popular thing to say. But the fact is. Some people don't like Meghan Markle cause shes Biracial.

And nothing, nobody will convince me otherwise of that.

And they feel she dosent belong in the Royal family cause shes half black.

The rest of the mob who dislike her. Dislike her because they believe shes not in the least in love with Harry. Just using him.

I wouldn't be surprised if shes not particularly love with him. He's a bit of a Dickhead.

But seriously what Californian girl would say no to marrying a European Prince.

You'd have to be nuts to say no to that offer. And Meghan Markle is far from nuts. Or stupid.

I do think she's being poorly advised by Media/PR spin doctors on how to manage her and Harry's image.

They are coming at it from a Hollywood perspective.

Thats completely wrong for European Royals. Royals are a whole social group within themselves. And are the polar opposite to Hollywood celebrity.

In an endless amount of ways.

Meghan doesnt understand this. And neither do the people managing her PR. So its bound to backfire.

I think, if you really beleive as a chick. That women's issues, disadvantages, abuse, exploitation is a really important issue today. Then you'd look past Meghan Markle's sparkle.

And focus on what's shes tryin to say. I think she has political future ahead. If she survives the Royal family.
CyndiTx123 said…
hahaha Thank you T.W.

Your so right about epstein weirdo... Something evil this way lurks with this guy.... like mcconnell, trump, I can go on.... Just wishing for the best for Americans and anyone in this world that has experience sadness, hurt, sorrow, I lift them up and pray for more happy & positive light shine all around us.
quiet said…


SMH here

There are people here who actually believe she carried a human infant for 10 months wearing 5 inch heels till the end of a pregnancy?

Did some of you not understand when she announced on October 15th 2018 that she was 3 months pregnant?

Did some of you not see her baby shower pics in Ney York with her friends only and she hired crowds on demand to give her a red carpet for publicity from limo to entrance of expensive hotel she had the shower in and on one of the 5 nights she was there she was photographed late at night exiting the limo and going into hotel with NO BABY BUMP?

Did some of you not see the, at least one dozen pics all over the net of her bump big at November and then very small in Jan because she kept wearing different size moon bumps that did not correspond with a pregnant woman's stomach growth during pregnancy?

How about giving birth on May 6th which is 44 weeks pregnant and she was wearing 5 inch high heels all the way thru until April at 9 months apparent pregnant? Pregnant women cannot run or squat down in 5 inch heels at 5 months pregnant or they lose their balance and fall over.


How about that first baby pic and actual video of harry and meghan and doll on may 8th, 2 days after it was born, where the baby did not breath move or flinch in Harrys arms?

please google.. reborn baby Darren.. sold out but when in stock 59.99
Look familiar?

How about those baptismal pics? the one on the couch with harrys baptism pic photo shopped in meghans arms and please look at kate sitting in the chair in this pic because if kate would stand up she would be 8 feet tall.??please google... harrys own baptismal pic..look familiar?

How about the black and white pic of the babys baptism pic with the parents only, being harry and meghan and the baby does not look like the same baby just hours before in the group baptismal pic because the black and white pic of her and harry holding baby is the REBORN Darren doll and not photo shopped Harry when he was an infant getting baptized

omg I could go on here.. I think I will with one more..

How about the july 11th or 12th polo charity match where harry and William played against each other for 3 hours in scorching hot sun and she took baby and held the reborn Darren doll for 3 hours staying away from anyone so they could not get a close look at archie but more importantly.. she held the doll in same position for 3 hours with babys legs dangling straight down as if his legs were paralyzed or had dead limbs,. she did not give the baby a bottle or change his diaper or have a sun bonnet on his head. she did not hold him right and babys toes or ankles or feet never twinkled or flinched for 3 hours in the sun. She did not give him a drink for 3 hours in the hot sun and any baby would have died with heat stroke being carried like that with no nappy or bottle or sun protection or a hat bonnet at least.

God
Please help the people who people who believe she just gave birth, Amen

Apple Monkey said…
Cyndi. It is so nice to see your messages. How are you?
Epstein is such a weirdo and that’s an insult to weirdos
All I can say is I hope the baby is being looked after well and he deserves to be happy. Unfortunately Harry and Meghan’s popularity is declining here in England.
T. W. said…
BG has a blind item claiming Me Again became upset because avocados are nearly impossible to get in Britain. The trees do not grow well if at all in Britain. She wants to have avocados flown in but she was informed this is cost prohibitive.
Chick'sOpinion said…
quiet

I have always maintained Meghan had a surrogate for a baby.

My suspicions were alarmed when she at 37, walked out of her wedding. Went on her honeymoon.


And immediately claimed she was pregnant. I thought hmmmm. That's a bit unlikely at her age.

I know it's very rare to fall pregnant naturally at 37. Not sayin impossible. And as I've said before...

I know ...cause I accidently fell pregnant at 37. And my Dr was shocked.

And. He told me I was lucky cause its unusual.

So I concluded. Either Meghan was pregnant already at her wedding. And had been on IVF treatment for ages.

Or a surrogate was having Harry's baby.

As someone who has been full term pregnant a few times. I too, was astonished when I saw Meghan being able to kneel down at right angles.

Impossible!!!once you are heavily pregnant. You just can't. The baby is in the way in your stomach to form a right angle.

And the high heels.
I wore high heeled sandals in my 2nd pregnancy. And it was agony.

Actually my husband at the time was pissed off with me about it.

Because he told me over over.
High heel shoes tips a pregnant women's centre of gravity out. Badly. And can cause falls easily.

No. I do believe a surrogate had Meghan's baby. And there's been a hold up with them getting the baby cause the surrogate wants more money.

They'll get their real baby. Eventually I think.

CD confirmed all this.. when he posted that 'Meghan would not be giving birth at that London Hospital. Because you can't get a baby in the back door'
T. W. said…
I love you CyndiTx123!
T. W. said…
Hi quiet!

Thank you for making me laugh today!

You've been too quiet lately, please keep the comments coming!
T. W. said…
I'm telling you, Prince Andrew was handed a gift. But so was the Truther Community. I make outrageous comments here, mostly for entertainment purposes. However time is proving me right. Didn't I tell y'all THEY need clones & human hybrids so the demons they worship can have a flesh body to live in our physical realm? How many of y'all are still laughing at that...



1. Alleged Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Hoped To 'Seed Human Race' With His DNA


"Billionaire financier and alleged pedophile Jeff Epstein reportedly had intentions to "seed the world" - by impregnating multiple women at his ranch in New Mexico."

https://mtonews.com/alleged-pedophile-jeffrey-epstein-hoped-to-seed-human-race-with-his-dna



2. Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA


" Mr. Epstein’s vision reflected his longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence. Critics have likened transhumanism to a modern-day version of eugenics, the discredited field of improving the human race through controlled breeding."


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/business/jeffrey-epstein-eugenics.html
T. W. said…
I thought babies ate every 2 hours. Even fake babies get fake food. What a crap actress. Maybe Meghan was instructed to act a fool to divert our attention...
Chick'sOpinion said…
TW

Nothing would surprise me about Jeffery Epstein.
T. W. said…
Hi Chick'sOpinion!
Jules said…
TW - Thank you so much for taking the time and effort to provide us with all the information on the alleged paedophile Epstein. I will admit it's making me sick to my very stomach.
Jules said…
There is a petition on Change.org to stop the uk funding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex Buckingham Palace really need to take note of this.

https://www.change.org/p/uk-parliament-stop-uk-funding-for-meghan-markle-prince-harry-s-lifestyle?signed=true
Anonymous said…
Amal Clooney acts like a "royal." She is an attorney, worked on high profile cases, married to George, a Hollywood royal. You see Amal, but she doesn't need the attention from the media, she is classy and let's George have the limelight.

Meghan Markle craves the attention and loves the limelight. I think she likes to stick it to her family that she married a royal. Narcissist? Maybe.

Meghan is supposedly friends with Amal; she might want to take notes from her friend.

I understand CyndiTX's concern about all the negative media attention lately, however, when you see her carrying her newborn like a sack of potatoes like no other royal has done before, not Diana, not Kate, and certainly not the Queen, it gives room for great criticism.

I think the lovely QUIET post nailed it. Of course, TW has been saying it all along.

CAP Anonymous
T. W. said…
Jules,

You are most welcome!

I see this as a public service. I know this site is "monitored" and I have faith the "right" people read what we say and do something positive in this world.
T. W. said…
Jules, that petition is legit?!

Thank you for my much needed laugh today!
T. W. said…
Hi CAP Anonymous!

Me Again is operating on the lower vibration of his/her Leo energy.

I think Anal Clooney learned his lesson.

Today is Meghan Sparkles' birthday. I wish all my Lovely Leos the bestest birthday this month! I hope we get lots of tribute, ug, I meant presents.
Chick'sOpinion said…
Yesssss. And that pic taken in St George's Hall. Of Meghan and Harry just after the so called birth of her baby. Showed her with a clearly crooked stomach.

You don't have a crooked stomach that goes in the wrong direction ...to the left or the right. After you have a baby.

When your stomach deflates. And everything starts to pull itself back into correct position.

I don't know the technical medical words for it.

But I've had kids. So I know it was odd.

She clearly had the moon bump on wonky. And didn't know.

A professional photographer would have noticed it before he clicked.

Clearly chose not to say anything to her.

If you look at the pic. Her feet/ legs are facing direct to the camera.

Her stomach is veering to the right.

That's very odd.
Anonymous said…
TW, is it your birthday? Well, if it is I sincerely wish you sunshine and health! I know you had a tough year but you seemed to have bounced back and I hope you continue to do well! You certainly bring an extra something to the website. Super impressed how much you seem to know about everything under the sun! A super smart lady!

Happy Birthday, TW! Hope you got lots of presents!

CAP Anonymous XO
T. W. said…
Thank you CAP Anonymous! You are so sweet and I receive your blessings!

It really was my 16th birthday again. I didn't get much, but what I got was great! Last night I dreamt I got a check in the mail. The check came when I wasn't looking for the money to come. I hope that dream comes to pass.

With love,

T. W.

Popular posts from this blog

Alexandra Grant. More lies? Did she forget she married another person 10 years ago... & is still married... UPDATE...

  I had a dream about Alexandra Grant. (Which in it's self is disturbing)   This is what I saw in the dream.   I SAW...   Alexandra Grant   is married. Not to Keanu Reeves.  T he marriage took place around 9/10 years ago on the  East coast of America.  (Not New York City)   I Saw She was in a  very close relationship with this  "Person" I See she was paid to do this... The person she is married to is of dubious character...   This person has been  "Away"  for quite a while...    (If you know what I mean)   This person is threatening to return..   She will...   To expose the marriage & other criminal behaviors  they both had a part in.    As I write this.   Keanu Reeves & his team.  Do not know of this.    Alexandra,  knows is still legally married. Has her head in the sand. Hoping it will go away...   STAY TUNED...    MORE TO COME...  

Morning everyone...

 

HRH King Charles III

Sending our  Thoughts & Prayers. 🙏🏻   To King Charles & his family. For a speedy recovery. At this challenging time.   *** I have done many readings  on King Charles & The Royals  in the past. On my Blog & on my You Tube. I will not be re-posting them here.