- Get link
- Other Apps
Labels:
Ghislaine Maxwell Jeffrey Epstein murdered prince andrew t kushner. tyk-tyk.cnn msnbc thesun skynews bbc itv sundaypeople trump WEIBO
qeuun elizabethII Prince andrew
- Get link
- Other Apps
Alexandra Grant. More lies? Did she forget she married another person 10 years ago... & is still married... UPDATE...
I had a dream about Alexandra Grant. (Which in it's self is disturbing) This is what I saw in the dream. I SAW... Alexandra Grant is married. Not to Keanu Reeves. T he marriage took place around 9/10 years ago on the East coast of America. (Not New York City) I Saw She was in a very close relationship with this "Person" I See she was paid to do this... The person she is married to is of dubious character... This person has been "Away" for quite a while... (If you know what I mean) This person is threatening to return.. She will... To expose the marriage & other criminal behaviors they both had a part in. As I write this. Keanu Reeves & his team. Do not know of this. Alexandra, knows is still legally married. Has her head in the sand. Hoping it will go away... STAY TUNED... MORE TO COME...
Comments
How about abolishing the British Monarchy? That worked out great for us Americans!
I want my title and land now.
Perhaps this is sweet justice. He won’t be able to cool himself off.
Beyoncé's 7-year-old daughter Blue Ivy just won her first songwriting award
https://ew.com/music/2019/11/18/beyonce-daughter-blue-ivy-wins-first-songwriting-award/
Blue Ivy Carter Is Already An Award-Winning Songwriter At 7 Years Old
https://dlisted.com/2019/11/19/blue-ivy-carter-is-already-an-award-winning-songwriter-at-7-years-old/
Right that's it. I've had it with this Beyonce and that over the hill, Hip Hop has-been, Jay Z.
So now they are using their 7 year old kid to make revenue for them. Claiming she wrote a song.
Remember how they trademarked their daughter, Blue Ivy's name. How disgusting was that?
Who does that?
I'll tell ya. Money hungry highly ambitious greedy materialistic parents.
They increasingly disgust me in their greed for more and more.
I was so glad when Christian predicted that their venture Tidal was gonna fail. On a monumental scale.
And it did.
Message to Jay Z
Jay Z. You ain't P Diddy.. Coombes.
You just don't have the genius for music business magician like financial success.
Face it. You have to live off ya wife's music career money.
Probably for the rest of your life.
Oh and revenue you make by flogging your kid as a music product.
And her name as a business venture.
It's been cast full of celebrities playing the Cats. Including Jason Derulo. And Taylor Swift
as the Cat, Bombalurina.
Personally I think Taylor Swift is a cat already. One of those nasty ones. Who bite you when go to pat them.
She's got nasty claws too. That come out at a moment's notice.
One thing I do like about her is one of her comments.
She said...
'So when Ed Sheeran writes/sings about his relationships. He's perceived as emotionally brave.
When I write songs about my relationships I'm claimed to be crazy'
She went on to say basically that,
'That's a double standard and sexist'.
I agree wholeheartedly.
I hope Ed Sheeran isnt in this movie Cats.
Because Taylor's cross claws may scratch his pale blue eyes out.
And then she'll write a song about it.
One of the fat Cats. I'd go and see it just to see her do that role.
I never thought there was anything funny about how ordinary Australian girls like her talk. And conduct themselves.
She got me to see the funny side of my culture.
Which I see is a good thing.
There are a few girls in my workplace who are just like Rebel Wilson. But no one notices.
I'll never forget doing a home visit with one of them to client's house.
And this fat Australian girl co worker, suddenly told our client that
'You know, im totally sick of my ex cause in fact guys, all he is, is a sperm donor'.
Omg. It was so inappropriate
The client looked at me for explanation as to what a Sperm Donor is.
I wanted to crawl under the client's sofa.
See. Australia is full of Rebel Wilson's.
She's not that special in that way.
Rebel Wilson just had the brains to put to good use her blunt no holds barred personality. Into the Entertainment industry.
And she's done very well out of it.
https://dlisted.com/2019/11/19/prince-andrew-could-finally-be-punished-under-the-rule-of-future-king-charles/
President Trump’s Weekend Hospital Visit Sparks Heart Attack Rumors
http://sandrarose.com/2019/11/president-trumps-weekend-hospital-visit-sparks-heart-attack-rumors/
The acting is over the top and the CGI is laughable.
https://dlisted.com/2019/11/19/theres-a-new-cats-trailer-out-and-its-still-very-wrong/
Ain’t no double standard.
People laugh at her because we know her relationships with men are fake.
Kanye West May be a laughing stock but at least he’s not hiding who he is. Well, Ricardo Tiscii might beg to differ but you get the idea.
And the way they are going on about all the CGI in the movie Cats...It's like it's a good thing it's full of CGI.
I agree. It's not.
Cats are Meowgical creatures. I only hope they are able to bring some their personalities to life.
But cats are in a league of their own.
You can't even come close.
That was hard for her then going against her sister's wishes. Imagine having to banish your favourite son?
Fergie must be shitting bricks because if her meal ticket is banished, where does she go? Maybe she'll move in with one of her daughters and live off them. Aren't I sarcastic!
Gee The Crown television series will have plenty of material for future shows.
Mark my words. It’s gonna be bad.
According to Blind Gossip, Fergie & Andrew are set to wed so his public image will be better. BG says Fergie knows this is the only way to secure her own future & that of her offspring.
I haven’t been on CDAN or AGCMainPages since October. I’m sure they have more information, uh, I meant gossip about this.
Interesting. All you guy's comments.
Mmmmmm. He's given up his Royal duties. And gonna lie low.
For a very long time.
Till he/the palace think this horrendous investigation is over.
And the public finally lose interest.
I think the FBI are perfectly aware of the level of Prince Andrew's involvement.
It's obvious.
And then theres how he's been serving his own financial interests....instead of the UK's.
Even during his period as Trade Representative for the UK.
I have been doing alot of reading and I have learned he's done alot of business deals with Kazakhstan.
To benefit the leader of Kazakhstan.
And himself.
Prince Andrew made personal profits in the millions in this instance.
By introducing foreign oligarchs, Businessmen, political leaders to other billionaires and political leaders.
Not in the UK.
Not for UK interests.
And sealing the deals on contracts with them and the other party.
And Prince Andrew's cuts out of the deals all went in his own pocket.
He's had a particular relationship with Kazakhstan Oligarch, Timur Kulibayev.
He also sold Timur Kulibayev his Sunninghill Park Mansion. For millions. 3 million over the asking price. Which is very suspicious to me.
And what did Timur Kulibayev do with the Sunninghill Park Mansion that the Queen gave Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson when they married in 1986.
He demolished.
But not for 3 years.
Sunninghill Park mansion was a wedding gift from the Queen. And it was built especially for Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson.
I find it not only a complete waste of the Queen's resources....that this spoilt pair failed to continue to reside in a perfectly sound mansion. Built for them.
And outrageously caused it to lie empty for a total of 8 years. And then be demolished.
For a start. It could have been a home for either Beatrice or Eugenie.
The newspapers are saying the the profit of the sale of Sunninghill Park went directly into a trust.
And that Prince Andrew didn't see a penny of it. I don't actually believe that.
And I also don't agree with the Royal family demolishing mansions.
They cost a fortune to build.
And it's such a waste of resources.
That's karma for sure. I hope they put him on suicide watch too. Him losing his royal status - could he cope with that?
What was so apparent from the interview was how he has no idea about the real world. He has been so moddle coddled and spoilt his whole life where he truly thinks he is superior. Me royal; you pleb is the vibe I get from him.
And how will he cope now with that status removed? I don't think he will cope. That's his journey - you dance the jig you pay the piper. Not that I wish him ill will.
One thing that I loved about Princess Diana was that she realized how the royal princes like Charles and Andrew were too protected from the outside world. As a result she was determined to show William and Harry what real life was about and showed them the other side of life where people are poor and are powerless.
Diana did a brilliant job as William and Harry know how life is not all about luxuries and priviledge and that people suffer. They are nothing like Andrew and know about the real world.
William is doing well and so is Harry, even though he married in haste to a woman unsuited to royal life. But that will be rectified when she walks away.
And how was Diana rewarded - they killed her off. This must be a trying time for the Queen.
And yes, what will the queen`s message be on Christmas morning. Will be a forced smile, no doubt.
Diana was not of royal blood, Andrew is. That makes all the difference. They`ll protect him because he is the son of Queen Elizabeth.
CAP Anonymous
And let's not forget. The millions that Prince Andrew was making in connecting businessmen up for contracts. With countries like Khazahkstan.
Is the money he used to give Epstein for his access to under age minors.
From the obvious fabulous wealth Epstein had.
It's clear that these paedophiles paid huge sums to Epstein for access. And even bigger sums for him to keep quiet about it.
And I completely agree with you.
That Lady Diana did a very good job of teaching her sons about how Royals are disadvantaged in life. Because they don't live in the real world.
And she taught them to understand how disadvantaged peoole are ...by lack, power and education. And the corrupt political situations they are born into.
She did succeed with Prince Harry too. I agree.
And it was only his naivety that got him in a relationship with a Goldigger like Meghsn.
And I agree. This will be rectified.
Once he gets shot of Meghan.
And he will re-marry someone who is the total opposite of her.
He dosent seem to be that keen on English aristocratic girls.
Which is unfortunate. Because they are in fact trained for marrying a royal...possibly.
And
Because of their class and position. And living in the UK. They understand EVERYTHING about how to conduct themselves properly.
Meghan doesn't seem to have a clue.
I think Meghan is a smartarse.
And this has been a big lesson for her.
To teach her, that she doesn't know half as much. As she thought she did. About other cultures.
And countries.
And classes of people.
I have no sympathy for the “royals.”
That mansion could have been used as a shelter for runaways, battered women & children, homeless, etc.
And you are right.
Australians are loud. And talk about anything.
Like alot of Americans do.
That's what I love about Americans
And we are generally at ease talking about emotions too.
We're not that focussed on being super private.
Which means you can get to know Australians rather quickly.
I understand that UK people are not commonly like this.
Guys. Consider change.
Let it all hang out.
Cause as with farts.
It's better out than in.
This is why I'm against emoticons.
They are not an alternative to havin a good talk to someone about what's happening with you.
Next they'll try and invent emoticons, emojis that talk back to you.
With robotic soothing words, like
'Awww did you have a bad day at work'?
And that's wrong.
More and more we are allowing robotic A.I to make us as humans absolute.
This is wrong. And wrong for us.
And those mansions - palaces and castles - they have way too many. Yep one alone could house all the homeless and victims of domestic violence from Britain.
But while the royals are here and have all the money, power, status and palaces at their disposal, they have a moral obligation to serve their public because of this privilege. They also must have high moral values and set an example of human decency to the public.
For that reason I'm glad Andrew has been kicked out of public life.
No joke. There are apps that talk to you to calm you down. They are creepy.
Princess Diana was indeed of noble blood. She was also related to Winston Churchill.
The Spencer Family is considered the most prominent of all the English nobility.
Rumor has it the Windsor’s are not truly of royal blood and that Prince Charles married Diana Spencer because she did. I do not know for certain if this is true but based on what little I have read this is very likely. The truth may lie somewhere in the middle.
1) Spencer family
The Spencer family is an aristocratic family in the United Kingdom. Founded in the 15th century, it has spawned numerous aristocratic titles including the extant dukedom of Marlborough, the earldoms of Sunderland and Spencer, and the Churchill barony. Two prominent members of the family during the 20th century were British prime minister Sir Winston Churchill and British royal family member Diana, Princess of Wales.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_family
2) Diana, Princess of Wales
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana,_Princess_of_Wales
3) Diana Russell, Duchess of Bedford
Princess Diana was named after her. She almost became Princess of Wales and died at a young age:
In 1961, her [Diana Russell] brother John's descendant, Viscount Althorp, became the father of a daughter whose name was not chosen until a week after the birth. The infant was christened Diana, after the Duchess of Bedford. Unlike her ancestor, the 20th-century Lady Diana Spencer married her Prince of Wales, Charles, in 1981. She died in 1997, aged 36, a year after their divorce. Victoria Massey, biographer of the earlier Lady Diana Spencer, noted the similarities between the lives of the two namesakes: as children, they both lived at Althorp and socialised with royalty; both grew up without a mother from the age of six; both were proposed as a bride for a Prince of Wales; both had an accident during their first pregnancy; and both died unexpectedly at a young age.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_Russell,_Duchess_of_Bedford
4) House of Windsor
The House of Windsor is the reigning royal house of the United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth realms. The dynasty is originally of German paternal descent and was a branch of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, itself derived from the House of Wettin, which succeeded the House of Hanover to the British monarchy following the death of Queen Victoria, wife of Albert, Prince Consort.
NOTE - All of the aforementioned Houses are GERMAN.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Windsor
It's sad you know, that she's unable to be here to guide Harry and William through their recent troubles. I do think once Meghan is out of the picture things will improve greatly between them.
Chocomint, I also appreciate your comments on the royals.
CAP Anonymous
Yes. It used to be quite well known ..that Lady Diana Spencer is more Royal than the current Royal Family, Windsor.
And in fact. When Lady Diana, the Princess Of Wales was at low points of frustration and sadness about the hostility and treatment by the Windsor's. And Prince Charles.
She used to chat to her father. When he was alive.
And he used to remind her. That she and her family, are more Royal than the Windsor's. And they know it.
Indeed they do know it.
And I believe the current Royal Family are in a way not entitled to call themselves English monarchs.
If you want to get down to fact based history.
And they are definitely history revisionists to suit themselves.
They changed their name from Saxe Coburg Gotha...to Windsor...to that English name, Windsor. Not because they wanted to.
But because of the first World War with Germany.
Suddenly having a Germanic name was extremely unpopular.
And considered unpatriotic.
But they are indeed a bunch of Germans in truth.
In fact. Queen Victoria spoke German more often than English during her reign.
It was a smart thing to do. To change their names to an English one. Because the 2nd World War came around. And again. Having anything German about you. Was extremely hated.
In Europe... during WW2 People wouldn't even go see German films. Even though they made many.
German imported products in the inter war years had to be stamped with 'foreign' because you couldnt even sell products with their German origin on them.
Even in the early 1950's.
The current Royal Family should have a label stamped on them in my view.
Reading, Made in Germany.
I believe Prince Charles and the Queen's decision to choose Lady Diana Spence as a bride. Was to get their Royal blood back on track.
By marrying Diana, Prince Charles and the Queen could be rest assured. That the children from that union could be fully recognized by blood, as true English Royals.
From their Spencer blood connection.
So Prince William will be a true English King to me. And so are his children.
And Kate his wife. Is completely English in genealogy.
The Windsors are frauds. In my opinion of course...
Interestingly Simon Abney-Hasting a British aristocrat living in Victoria, Austalia is thought to be the real King of England. Through his grandmother Barbara Huddleston Abney-Hastings, 13th Countess of Loudoun, he is directly descended from, and heir-general of George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence, brother of Edward IV and Richard III.
In 2004, channel 4 made the documentary called Britain's Real Monarch— this repeated the claim that the Earl's father, Michael, as the senior descendant of George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence, was the rightful King of England. This argument involves the claim that Edward IV of England was illegitimate, based on the accusation that his supposed father, Richard, Duke of York, was absent at the time when Edward is thought to have been conceived; and second, that the Plantagenet crown should have descended by male-preference cognatic primogeniture instead of agnatic primogeniture and conquest. Also, Henry VI had placed an attainder on Edward after he was restored to the throne, and named George, Duke of Clarence, as heir to the throne after Henry VI and his legitimate issue. The Earl, following his father's death, would have become the rightful monarch of England under this alternative path of succession, rather than Elizabeth II. This is a claim to the throne of England but not the whole of the United Kingdom, as the English line joined that of Scotland in 1503 with the marriage of Margaret Tudor to James IV of Scotland.
I am enjoying the history lessons and your expertise. Please keep them coming!