Skip to main content

Two entitled tits....


Comments

Chick'sOpinion said…
And most know how it ended for Margaret Thatcher.

As she remained in her 'power illusion '

Until the year 1990, hit that bitch right in the eye.

The writing was on the wall. That she was hated far more, when she tried to introduce Poll Tax in the UK. And make all UK people pay it. Even the unemployed.

But she didn't see how furious the British public were about it.

To a rioting level.

She thought it was gonna be as difficult to get over the line, like the destruction of the Miners in the North was.

And would eventually succeed.

Like it did with her demoralizing and eliminating the UK Miners, their Trade Unions.
And their whole of way of life and livelihoods.

Well she was F..cking wrong.

It's my eternal satisfaction that I was one of the 250,000 rioters that day in London that ....ultimately got that bitch Margaret Thatcher out of Office.

I took the day off work with my friend to go.

Christian is drawing a comparison I think between Margaret Thatcher and her misreading the times at the end of her prime minister term.

With how out of touch Prince Andrew is with the times. And the people.

He thinks that the public are that stupid. And gullible. And will belive his nonsense.

Just goes to show how cynical and disrespectful he is.

And he's not only being hated in the UK.

Commonwealth countries ate watching all this too.

And are disgusted him.
T. W. said…
I had to read that twice.
T. W. said…
A Former Aide Has Accused Prince Andrew Of Once Using The N-Word


https://dlisted.com/2019/11/18/a-former-aide-has-accused-prince-andrew-of-once-using-the-n-word/
T. W. said…
Jeffrey Epstein accuser alleges sick sex assault by woman before rape by him


No excerpts from the article due to sickening details.


https://nypost.com/2019/11/18/jeffrey-epstein-accuser-alleges-sick-sex-assault-by-woman-before-rape-by-him/
Jules said…
He told his mother the interview went well .... it did .... it went very well for his victims.
Anonymous said…
Wowzers! When you got nothing to prove, you got nothing to prove, right? That's why he decided to do a sit down interview, because he is guilty, guilty, guilty.

Queen Mum must believe every word her boy tells her. I feel sorry for her as a mother, because it's all gonna come out and it's not gonna be pretty.

Entitled indeed. All those young women and how their lives changed dealing with Einstein and all his sick, entitled "friends."

He must be shaking in his boots. The short clip of the interview I had seen on the news tonight, Andrew looked like he hadn't slept all night.

Ex-wife Fergenstein tweeted something about how he is the most honest, kindest man she's ever known (not verbatim). Ugh.

CAP Anonymous
Amy said…
Some wounds will never heal.
T. W. said…
CAP Anonymous

Thanks for the Ferguestein comment.

If Andrew is so wonderful then why did she divorce him?

THEY are counting on us to have no critical thinking skills of any kind.
Chick'sOpinion said…
Yes. And they are saying Prince Andrew's legal situation rests, among other things ....on whether it can be proved that Prince Andrew knew that the girls he had sex were under age.

Did Epstein assure Prince Andrew, the girls he picked for Prince Andrew....where over 18.

When they were not.

Its a vague possibility.

I can't imagine Prince Andrew really caring about this crucial issue. Of age of consent.

Because he's been so reckless in his conduct so far. In everything else.

He didn't heed the warning signs ...That he was going to get exposed. When he chose to continue contact with Epstein even after Epstein was arrested and charged as way back as 2005.
T. W. said…
Depending on where the sex acts took place, age of consent is lower than 18.

Let’s say Prince Andrew meets a 17 year old girl in New York. She is still a minor but meets age of consent.

Let’s say he and this same girl travel throughout America and they have sex in various states.

Transporting a minor across state lines for sex is a federal crime.
Chick'sOpinion said…
TW

Thank you for that info TW

And you know.... Esptein and Ghislaine Maxwell would have known the age of consent in every country around the globe.

His genius for hiding money exchanges and his customers identities. Combined with experience and
Knowledge of laws pertaining to these young girls.

Pretty much ensured the reckless career he had.

Of damaging many many young lives, and it continued for decades.
T. W. said…
You are welcome Chick’sOpinion!
Chick'sOpinion said…
Cap Anonymous

Isn't it unbelievable how Sarah Ferguson defends any negativity at Prince Andrew.

Like she works for him.

She's completely unlike any normal ex. I believe.

Because she dosent have a normal 'ex's' relationship with him.

Most people can't stand their ex's. And are thrilled when they make huge mistakes. That prove you're right. That they are the idiots. Or arseholes you claimed they were.

Sarah Ferguson's income is tied to her former Royal marriage. And her whole identity is.
Is that normal for ex's? As you know, no.

And she lives off the proceeds of that. And always will

She didn't do what other divorced aristocrats often do.

They marry another wealthy powerful man.

And go off and get their own life.

Not Sarah Ferguson.

She has never seemed to want a new life enough.

She's hooked on her former Royal identity.
And it's power. Cause it's lucrative. At least shes made it that way. With Prince Andrew.

But I think she has arrived at a crossroads.

If Prince Andrew is no longer a respected Royal.

And has no influence.

Then neither does Sarah Ferguson.

So how are they going to fund their jet set lifestyle in future?

Interesting question.

This may be what forces Sarah Ferguson to either Marry someone else cashed up and powerful.

Or....she re-marries as predicted Prince Andrew.

And settles down to a modest quiet life on the limited income the Queen gives them.

They say it won't happen till Prince Phillip is dead.

Because he hates Sarah Ferguson.
Anonymous said…
Excellent question, Chick`s Opinion. Why did Sarah leave Andrew.

Maybe Jules knows the answer.

Didn`t Christian say Andrew liked boys. Or is that some other brother.

(Microsoft Windows has messed up my computer (again) and I cannot do question marks. Ugh)

CAP Anonymous
Chick'sOpinion said…
Cap Anonymous

Don't worry about question marks.
I barely remember commers.
T. W. said…
Hi CAP Anonymous!

Sarah Ferguson hinted at Prince Andrew’s pedophilia in her book.

Christian did say one of the royals preferred little boys but I forget which royal.

Doesn’t matter. They are a bunch of Satan worshippers. Child sexual abuse is normal for them.
Jules said…
Sarah, Duchess of York has claimed in her own autobiographies (and in various interviews over the years) she never wished to divorce the Duke, whom she loved dearly, however, due to the mountain of debts she ran up following her separation she has said she was left with no choice and had to divorce Andrew so she could work, stating ‘you cannot work and be a member of the Royal family.’ However, it has been widely reported that, just as with Charles and Diana, it was the Queen who following the infamous toe-sucking fiasco ordered the couple to divorce.

Sarah herself wrote in her 1996 autobiography “My Story”…

“If ever the Royal Family needed a respite, it was in August of 1992. The Queen would later call it her annus horribilis, the year of torn mornings and shattered peace. In April, Princess Anne entered divorce proceedings against Captain Mark Phillips. In June came the first published extracts of Diana: Her True Story, a tabloid-flavoured rendering of the Princess of Wales’ bulimia, suicide tries, and marital problems with Prince Charles." She continues: “Not one to be left out, I’d had my own bit to contribute. From early on that year, Andrew and I had been discussing a separation. Not because we’d stopped caring for one another, but because I had reached the end of my royal rope. “For six years I had shouldered the demands of Palace life. I’d endured the constant scrutiny of the British press and the barely veiled hostility of the Royal Household, the courtiers who run the show. Gradually, relentlessly, they had beaten me down. They were killing me by inches. It was time to save my life.”

Sarah spent the majority of her marriage on her own, Andrew was in the Navy and was only home for 40 days every year. She felt unsupported by Andrew and very much alone.


Anonymous said…
Chick's Opinion, I can do question marks again, ?????????????? The Microsoft Windows fairy must have heard me. LOL

TW, Sarah wrote THAT about Andrew in her book? Boy, she must have been angry during her divorce! That is a horrendous thing to say about someone, especially if it weren't true. And if it is true, why does she support him assuming she knows the truth about his ventures with Enstein and the women.

Money, I guess.

JULES, thanks for posting that! That is telling, isn't it? I don't think the royal life is all it's cracked up to be. There are riches, but perhaps little freedom. Perhaps that is why when some of them rebelled, it was so severe.

Can't wait for Christian's 2020 predictions!

CAP Anonymous

Chick'sOpinion said…
Jules


Mmm I read that with interest.

Yes well...as you know, Sarah Ferguson. May write books making all sorts of claims.

It's a great pity. Alot of what she writes isnt true.

She's never practiced what shes preached. In my view.

She's been the master of the double life from the get-go.

But to her eternal annoyance. The British media discovered how she was living in the early 90's.
Affairs... demanding free new kitchens etc, based on her Royal status.

She really cheapened the dignity of the Royals.

And continued to do so. Long after her marriage ended.

She was tougher than Diana. Way tougher.
And she's lying. She handled the hostility from Palace staff very well.

I'm pretty certain Lady Diana mentioned Sarah Ferguson's thick skin.

No one would put her off. She knew she had Royal power and used it.

Yes. I believe she rarely saw Andrew.
That part is true.

But as for her having to work. Does she expect people who are familiar with her spending habits to believe that shit.

And her claim to need more money from working when she was a Duchess.

She was given a brand new mansion as a wedding gift. She comes from a rich family.

She had the opportunity to stay in Royal Palaces on a regular basis.

She got a free income from the Queen.

She got and expected to get alot of free shit in her marriage.

She got staff.

How much more extravagance and money did she want/need?

In mean seriously...her biography is laughable don't you agree?

The failure of her Royal life was that she could not stop spending.

She had debts everywhere.

She is incapable of living modestly.

Unlike other Royals. Who live within their means.

She's a materialistic cow. And the UK's greatest hypocrite.

I have no sympathy for her.

Because she's deeply into greed.
Jules said…
It does not surprise me in the least that Sarah continually sings the Duke's praise, he is, after all, her meal ticket, he provides a roof over her head and no doubt provides her with an income.
Jules said…
Chicks Opinion - The press was utterly vile towards the Duchess of York, and it’s been well reported that she was treated with utter disdain from the palace courtiers. She may have been thick-skinned, but the press and courtiers broke her, she couldn’t take any more of it.

When the news first broke of the Duke and Duchess separation Charles Anson, the Queen's press secretary, had no option but to make an official announcement. Anson also gave a background briefing to a correspondent from the BBC, he clearly put the blame on the Duchess for the marital rift stating the Duchess was 'unsuitable for royal and public life' because of her unruly behaviour, the correspondent went onto report "the knives are out for Fergie at the palace." Of course, the press secretary was obliged to apologize to the Queen and the Duchess for giving the briefing, however, this clearly highlighted what the courtiers honestly felt about her.
Chick'sOpinion said…
Jules

Meal Ticket. That's a good description of her relationship with Prince Andrew.

I remember how the Press hounded her.

And I remember that the British Press never really liked either Lady Diana or Sarah Ferguson. Eventually.

But ultimately...I feel it was Sarah Ferguson who they were right about.

She wasn't suitable for Royal life.

Diana was. I feel.

Because.....had she not had the unhappy misfortune of her husband f..cking someone else through her entire marriage. She would have handled Royal life extremely well.

She hid the tears and sadness so well. Don't you think.
But her loneliness and unhappiness was revealed to the public. Eventually.

When we learned of her affairs.

She really was a Lady in every sense though.

Sarah Ferguson has never seemed a Lady to me.

Principally because she doesn't have an ethical approach to her position. And never learned to.

If she did. She would have never sold access to Prince Andrew.

But according to her, the hypocrite...She respects the monarchy and the Queen hugely and that's one of her goals in life.

Ummm. No.

She's really brought embarrassment to the Queen.
Had she remained in the Royal family she would have done far more embarrassing things I think.

I did think how the British Press 'fat shamed' Sarah Ferguson back then was wrong though.

The Press can't get away with that sort of thing any more.

Good.
T. W. said…
The Duchess of Pork is counting on people to have a short memory.

I wonder if subsequent printings of her book contain different information than the first edition...
Chick'sOpinion said…
TW

Wouldn't surprise me.

Sarah Ferguson doesn't get it.

That you have to live up to the image and beliefs you claim.

I read one of her books she wrote. In between boring subjects at uni.

I think it was the one called, What I know: Simple Lessons Learned The Hard Way.

It was all kind of Buddhist inspired type of tales about what shes learned. With positive thinking stuff. And how she has taught her daughter's this stuff.

Quite remarkable in that...after I read this book in about 2003. I noticed a sharp difference in how she conducted herself. And her claims in the book.

A huge contrast.

For a start in the book. She basically claims that money is not what's important ... it's family.

But the reality of her and Prince Andrew's life and her kids. Was even back then... all about the Jet Set lifestyle.

Then she got caught selling access to Prince Andrew... to a fake businessman for a huge sum of money. I think she did this twice.

And she has been a determined advocate to get her girls faces at the Palace more often. And in the media as Royals.

When really they are just cousins.. And minor Royals.

And Prince Andrew went wild when the Queen cut off funding Beatrice and Eugenie's jet set lifestyle.

More recently he's still tryin to get more money outa the Palace for those girls. And Sarah Ferguson is behind him all the way.

Don't doubt that for a second.
It's like she wants them virtually on the Throne.

Well Sarah's book, Simple Lessons: What I know. Proved to me long ago.

That she hasn't learned Simple Lessons. And doesn't 'know' much.

And that she is a total and utter hypocrite.

Further, is it Buddhist philosophy to support and advocate for Pedophiles?

Probably not.

It may be Bhuddist to forgive them.

But to be friends with and allow a paedophile to pay off your huge debts. Isn't Buddhist. Or very wise.

Which is exactly what Epstein did.

He paid off all Sarah Ferguson's debts. To save her from bankruptcy years ago.

Actually I'm pretty certain it was her second filing for bankruptcy.

No. TW. I am extremely cynical about these people who write books preaching to others about life's lessons.

When really they haven't learned anything at all.

Don't mind if they have.

But when it's just crap. It annoys me.
T. W. said…
Thank you Jules!

According to CDAN, most celebrities do not write their own books. Enty is not referring to people who have a professional writer help them. He is talking about those who claim to be the solo author.
T. W. said…
According to CDAN Christina Crawford wrote her book but was pressured by the publishers to redact the truly horrible things Joan Crawford did.

Enty also claims Lisa Marie Presley wrote her memoir and is ready to tell all, including names. Enty claims publishers are afraid to print the book and want her to leave out certain names and events.

Popular posts from this blog

Alexandra Grant. More lies? Did she forget she married another person 10 years ago... & is still married... UPDATE...

  I had a dream about Alexandra Grant. (Which in it's self is disturbing)   This is what I saw in the dream.   I SAW...   Alexandra Grant   is married. Not to Keanu Reeves.  T he marriage took place around 9/10 years ago on the  East coast of America.  (Not New York City)   I Saw She was in a  very close relationship with this  "Person" I See she was paid to do this... The person she is married to is of dubious character...   This person has been  "Away"  for quite a while...    (If you know what I mean)   This person is threatening to return..   She will...   To expose the marriage & other criminal behaviors  they both had a part in.    As I write this.   Keanu Reeves & his team.  Do not know of this.    Alexandra,  knows is still legally married. Has her head in the sand. Hoping it will go away...   STAY TUNED...    MORE TO COME...  

Morning everyone...

 

HRH King Charles III

Sending our  Thoughts & Prayers. 🙏🏻   To King Charles & his family. For a speedy recovery. At this challenging time.   *** I have done many readings  on King Charles & The Royals  in the past. On my Blog & on my You Tube. I will not be re-posting them here.