Alexandra Grant. More lies? Did she forget she married another person 10 years ago... & is still married... UPDATE...
I had a dream about Alexandra Grant. (Which in it's self is disturbing) This is what I saw in the dream. I SAW... Alexandra Grant is married. Not to Keanu Reeves. T he marriage took place around 9/10 years ago on the East coast of America. (Not New York City) I Saw She was in a very close relationship with this "Person" I See she was paid to do this... The person she is married to is of dubious character... This person has been "Away" for quite a while... (If you know what I mean) This person is threatening to return.. She will... To expose the marriage & other criminal behaviors they both had a part in. As I write this. Keanu Reeves & his team. Do not know of this. Alexandra, knows is still legally married. Has her head in the sand. Hoping it will go away... STAY TUNED... MORE TO ...
Comments
So how long will it be before she will dump Harry? He’s not going to be as attractive with less money?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7866007/Harry-Meghan-step-senior-royals-financially-independent.html
Royal watchers and seers have been saying Prince Charles is making moves to have only those in the direct line of succession be supported with public funds.
Don’t be surprised if Harry loses his title.
Can you safely comment as to why Duchess Catherine does not like Rose Hanbury.
Rumors are floating again. One person claimed they kissed each other but removed the video before I could watch it. The video title may have been misleading.
Please.
Enquiring minds are desperate to know.
Not leaving the Royal Family out of their own choice?
If she's no longer Royal perhaps it will be cheaper for the Royal family when she divorces Harry.
It will be just an ordinary Public divorce.
Really Meghan is about money, money, money and I don't quite think that the royal family and the Queen being conservative and frugal with money, meaning they don't like members to over-spend or flash their wealth, suited Meghan.
Hmmm with the taxpayers spending millions to renovate Frogmore, with them no longer being senior royals, I wonder if they will be able to keep it. Interesting Meghan/Harry times.
But really she never suited the conservative royal life and family from day one. Amazing that the Queen and the family didn't see through her in the beginning. Only William did, that's what caused the rift between the brothers.
Support for having a monarchy at all in the UK is dropping.
Because people are questioning... why have a family, who require armies of servants? A family that uses so much revenue of the public's. And occupies huge castle's, mansions and palaces.
And yet most of them don't justify their exclusive status, with what they do for the public.
But I would argue, the British Royal family attract a huge amount of tourism. And that means revenue for the UK. For everybody.
That the UK will lose, if the monarchy ends.
Also, the Royal family keep the customs, history and traditions alive.
And many people love that.
That will end.
Prince Charles slimming down the monarchy. And getting rid of these free loading hangers on.
Like Beatrice and Eugenie...is a smart move.
All they are ....are cousins to Prince William and Harry.
And neices of Prince Charles.
If Prince Charles makes ruthless decisions.
With this slimming down.
The British Monarchy just may limp on for another 2 generations.
Yes. I know the Queen derives alot of her own income from her land and estates.
But it's the small levy each employee pays out of their pay cheque to the Crown thats pissing people off.
And sadly alot of the UK people believe they are paying for everything for the Royal family.
No they are not.
The Queen is largely Self-Funded.
Booted out!!
And Prince Harry and Meghan are going to explain this as ...it was their choice to leave the Monarchy.
Ummmm
Nope. Kicked to the kerb. And kicked out. For causing trouble, risking the image and reputation of the entire monarchy.
Insulting the monarchy in public.
Overspending to a ridiculous level.
Causing profound rifts between Royals who formally had good relationships.
Doing what you like.
Competing with the Duchess of Cambridge when she is a future Queen of England.
Using the media for personal publicity.
Applying for Trademarks ....when it's the Queen only who financially benefits from goods and services with the Queen's emblem, arms or insignia.
And only she decides what goods or services get Royal approval for that.
Mixing with celebrities all the time.
Not doing many Royal engagments
Sorry the list is endless.
Far too mamy reasons to list why these two have been booted out of the Monarchy.
But does Archie remain a Royal?
And therefore, as a British subject, must remain in the UK. Under the supervision of the Queen.
Or wherever Archie currently is.
It will be interesting to see what happens with that.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Address Every Question About Bombshell Announcement — See Them All!
https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-address-every-question-about-bombshell-announcement-see-them-all/
Prince Harry And Duchess Meghan Announce That They’re Stepping Back As Senior Royals (UPDATES)
https://dlisted.com/2020/01/08/prince-harry-and-duchess-meghan-announce-that-theyre-stepping-back-as-senior-royals/
Meghan and Prince Harry QUIT the Royal Family; Harry gives up royal title for Meghan; Queen Elizabeth learned of their decision on TV
http://sandrarose.com/2020/01/meghan-and-prince-harry-quit-the-royal-family-harry-gives-up-royal-title-for-meghan-queen-elizabeth-learned-of-their-decision-on-tv/
DR Congo measles: More than 6,000 dead in world's worst outbreak
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-51028791
He will have none of the assets and income as a Private citizen. As opposed to when he was a Royal.
And this may protect the inheritance he got from his mother, Diana too. Not sure.
If Prince Harry are Meghan are non Royals by the time they divorce.... then it's more than likely Meghan will NOT be able to get her hands on Royal property, Royal Jewellery etc. Through her divorce.
And. Not be able to argue for...or be appointed life time use of say, Royal Mansions, apartments either.
A long time ago I read a psychic's reading on this. And it was claimed...Meghan is not going to get near the amount of money through this divorce. As she plans.
And she plans big money.
This might ....all be the reason why she doesn't get the 'big' money.
But they did say that she uses the threat of writing a Tell-All book one day. To at least get some of the money.
This would be a very dangerous move for her. Tell All books. If she attempts it. Or threatens it.
Because the Crown may decide it's cheaper and far safer. To bump her off.
Remember, Mi6 and Mi5 exist for many things. But one of their roles. Is to protect the monarchy.
At all costs. If it is threatened...in any way.
This is one of the examples they choose ...for protection. They swear allegiance to the Queen and Crown when they join these UK institutions.
That's not imaginary. That's a fact.
And I have always believed they murdered Lady Diana.
Another thing, in Divorce in Australia, you get awarded money or division of assets according to how long the union...marriage has lasted.
The smaller the time..the less money.
Meghan has only been married a short time.
I dont know if the UK have similar divorce laws. But it wouldn't surprise me if they did.
CD, u r bang on the money again x
Just stopped by to see what Christian had to say about this "royal" news today about Harry and Meghantroid.
A lot of people on Twitter and LinkedIn are in favor of this "independence."
I didn't see ALL the remarks (impossible), but what little I did view, people are positive. Interesting.
Meanwhile, Australia burns. When will it stop?
Back on the weekend!
CAP Anonymous
Thanks. Can you believe how accurate Christian is!!
And you know what I'm wondering now.....
Is the Queen getting Meghan outa the family before the person who knows all about Meghan's small time on the Yachting Prostitution circuit.
Reveals it all.
I'm sure the British Press already know about it.
That's bad enough.
They may already have an agreement with the Queen not to publish.
At least not yet.
Or ever.
And. It's too lucrative a story for her so called old close friends to resist, if they know too..
...to sell the story. Some would know about Meghan's time doing that.
Or people who remember her visits to yachts. Yachts need a crew. Funny enough, they are often Australians. On these International billionaires Yachts.
As we know, Australians are big on sailing. Like the South Africans. And have plenty of experience.
But Aussies love money. So if an Aussie crew member knows about it.
They'll talk. For the right price.
Meghan went into this whole Royal thing. With way too much in her past, anyway.
To be able to survive it.
Just her family are a barrier in itself.
She should have gone on what I think was her true path. Becoming a politician.
And a very good one.
But her greed for money. And international fame caused her to choose this.
What girl would say no to a Prince wanting to marrry you?
Well a British aristocratic girl.
Clearly.... aristocrat, Cressida Bonas said no.
Hell no.
She knew eactly what kind of lifestyle it involved.
Meghan didn't have the first clue..
Isn't it remarkable how we all knew it wouldn't work out back then thanks to CD. Remember then - it's not that far back really - everyone was so lovey dovey about the match. They were full of praise for Meghan and happy that Harry had finally found love.
Very sad for Harry though. I wonder what Diana's spirit thinks of it in the spirit world.
Whatever will the UK talk about now?...., nothing for it, I suppose it's back to complaining about the weather ......
To the left to the left
To the left to the left
Everything you own in the box to the left
To the left to the left
Don't you ever for a second get
to thinkin... you're irreplaceable
Bye bye Meghan
Cordelia u summed it up perfectly.
I can’t work out if this has been done with the Queen’s knowledge and paving the way to their eventual split. They have only been married for eighteen months and UK dictates you need to be separated for two years. Meghan yesterday stepped out without her rings.
It’s all so strange.
1) Are UK divorce laws about being separated for 2 years different if one spouse is not a UK citizen?
2) Is it true Meghan cannot hold public office in America because she held a title given to her by a foreign government?
3) Is it possible Harry knew he made a mistake and he is working with the Queen to protect himself & the monarchy?
Interesting points.
Well. Meghan doesn't like limits. Like these.
Or rules. Made up by in-laws.
I kinda get why she rebelled.
I almost had a mother-in-law at her age.
Being talked to by your in-laws... like you are child is like a red rag to a bull. Once you are in your late 30's.
Hell. It's infuriating when you are 24.
But see Meghan needed to get it into context.
When your husband's grandma is the Queen. Ya kinda gotta listen.
And turn up with a smile at Christmas. Wearing a face you keep in the jar by the door.
And no thinkin up big ideas.
Without running them first, by the mother-in-law and the High Priestess, your husband's grandmother.
TW perhaps alot of Americans will be glad Meghan may not be able to hold Public Office there.
But you know, that Dumb Bitch Ivanka got a very high political career in the U.S without any personal effort.
So why not Meghan?
Yes. Meghan's lust for luxury. And materialism shocks me.
It's the weakness of her character.
She's just lost being being Princess because of it.
At least I think that was part of it.
No dollar discount shops for Meghan. Or 2nd Hand umbrellas.
Nope.
And no wearing designer outfits twice.
If she did that a few times. Wear them a 2nd time.
It was only because she came under sharp criticism.
From the Royal family. And the public.
Yes. She ought to reflect. Marie Antoinette got her head cut off for similar crimes.
Meghan's gone back to Canada with her head firmly attached.
It's a win/win for everyone
Why Kate went off her.
An Affair with Prince William? Or just a girl bitch fight?
Over gossiping.
Kate seriously has to watch who she chats with.
My advice to her would be. 'Kate, just tell your deepest secrets to that grinning idiot, your sister Pippa'.
And dont trust those other cows.
The other thing I wanted to mention that in the UK, the standard response for an anti Meghan comment is it’s racist. That’s ridiculous. I am an ethnic minority - I hoped Harry would be happy after the tragedy he suffered. But I had my reservations about Meghan. We have Brexit uncertainty, our high street shops are constantly closing down. There was a terrorist attack before Christmas. My point being, we expect the Royal Family to behave in a certain way, not flaunt their opulent lifestyle, whinging about their luxurious lifestyle. They don’t have the worries that we do - an already stressed out NHS, ridiculous house prices, job uncertainty. People wanted to be happy for them but they have crossed the line.
There is a small part of me that wonders if this is to cover a potential divorce as they do things or try to do things quietly. Tom Bradby who is a friend of Harry and interviewed them for the South Africa documentary says that the Queen had talked about a slimmed down monarchy and they were not part of it. But then Charles wanted a slimmed down monarchy which would have been himself and Camilla, William and his family and Harry and his family. In short there is so much here say, I don’t really know. X
Apple Monkey
Yes. How can the majority of Anti-Meghan comments have anything to do with Race. Agree.
People are alot more in tune with their psychic selves these days.
And they can pick up clearly. That regardless of someone's race, colour. They can tune in and pick up what kind of person someone is.
Or is not.
What they are faking.
And in Meghan's case. She's faking a variety of things.
And lets not forget too I guess. People are able to look at Meghan's history and current lust for luxury. Designer brands.
Designer people, celebrities, VIP Parties.
Husbands who are either famous or powerful.
And draw their own rational conclusions. About her character.
That in itself has nothing to with race. It's character.
No. People who are claiming that critisim of Meghan is just 'racist'. Are just lazy people, and clearly not in tune.
And probably not that interested. In that. Or integrity for that matter.
And far more interested in being perceived as 'woke'
Than spiritually aligned.
And let me say. 'Woke' is the new word for Political Correctness'
Younger generations have re-branded it.
To see if it can be continued another way.
No it cant.
Because the public are sick of it.
And also Meghan has started something positive. At least in my view.
She has proven on the world's stage. That most people who claim to be 'woke' are the greatest hypocrites ever seen.
That 'woke' is actually now a by-word for crap and hypocrisy.
I am sleepy but I am awake. Being "woke" is a joke and an insult.