She's losing the plot......
As those of you that read this blog,
on a regular basis.
I have predicted along that the
"Relationship"
between
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart
was a PR job.
However is seems that madame has forgotten that, and lost the plot.
On Valentines Day.
She bombarded Robert
(who's downunder)
with numerous texts and calls.
Didn't she know that, that to Robert,
Valentines Day was the day before.?
She's heading for a fall........
Comments
Christian has also predicted Rob will be well and will do best behind the camera (directing). Kristen is an equal opportunity tramp and needs better friends. Girlfriend is a trainwreck waiting to happen.
I have also pointed out August is a slow news month for gossip, so if the breakup were to happen then it would be major news for a long time. Also, someone who could prove the relstionship is a sham could get major bucks if they provided it to the tabloids. September, the yellow press might not be willing to pay. Besides, even Stevie Wonder can see KPat is not a real couple.
Friends, please check the archives before asking KPat questions. You can see the dates of his predictions and you will see people get their news from Christian. Go to the search box on the right side of your computer screen. You will not be able to see it on your mobile device. Tell your friends.
Christian, I am sorry for the late response. I have had a migraine headache and I care for two boys. Everyone be blessed and stay blessed! T. W.
http://www.popsugar.com/Robert-Pattinson-Moving-Out-Kristen-Stewarts-House-30558228
Any truth to this rumor?
I posted these this comment about these Kstew and Rpatz before. What people keep saying that this type of contract isn’t legal, and they’re right. But of course, there are always loopholes in Hollywood.
If the movie studio “suggested” the two actors to sign a separate marketing deal with a PR firm and sign an umbrella contract agreement with the PR company, who then is paid by the studio for selling/promoting the couple as a product during a certain time frame, it becomes a grey area in legalese. Because then contractually, the actors are legally bound to the PR firm and not the studio, which are in a separate, parent contract with the firm.
It’s basically, one company hires the other for unspecified or an amalgam of services and the other defines the parameters, which would be previously discussed and agreed to by all parties involved. Therefore directly stepping around SAG/AFTRA guidelines.
I assume that the contract can still be enforced because like most contracts, when you break the terms there is a monetary penalty amongst other penalties. Probably very a large sum in their cases.
These types of contracts are fairly common, and when umbrella contracts are signed, they are signed with multiple parties involved. So, to be fair, she’s probably not the only one making him carry out the entire contract. The PR company probably has a cut in the profits from the studio for the films.
If he were being sued in the first place by speaking up, that would be a whole different thing. The contract isn’t illegal, if it isn’t drafted up directly by the film studio. If the the studio has their own separate contract with the PR firm, and the PR firm also have their own with the actors, the PR firm works succinctly with the marketing dept of the studio, everyone benefits and gets paid. But it’s all dependent on the terms of the actual contract and specifics on standard-operating-procedure in their “lives together”, which the actors agreed upon in the first place. Since, we don’t know what was drafted up in the contract, there must be something contractually with the firm, that’s keeping Patinson from trying to get quietly get it nullified, but seeing as he’s doing multiple back-to-back films this year, riding the contract out until August may have deemed not too a bad option? Besides the fact of blacklisting."