Alexandra Grant. More lies? Did she forget she married another person 10 years ago... & is still married... UPDATE...
I had a dream about Alexandra Grant. (Which in it's self is disturbing) This is what I saw in the dream. I SAW... Alexandra Grant is married. Not to Keanu Reeves. T he marriage took place around 9/10 years ago on the East coast of America. (Not New York City) I Saw She was in a very close relationship with this "Person" I See she was paid to do this... The person she is married to is of dubious character... This person has been "Away" for quite a while... (If you know what I mean) This person is threatening to return.. She will... To expose the marriage & other criminal behaviors they both had a part in. As I write this. Keanu Reeves & his team. Do not know of this. Alexandra, knows is still legally married. Has her head in the sand. Hoping it will go away... STAY TUNED... MORE TO ...
Comments
He also keep quiet that he knew Meghan before
Harry met her
He us such a reptile
Queenie's only goal, and has always been her goal, and that is for the survival of the Monarchy. Whether they lie to make it survive, it doesn't matter JUST AS LONG AS IT SURVIVES.
Also, I wonder if CDs prediction about a Meghan Markle sex tape coming out has any connection with the Epstein scandal, and maybe she was caught in the Epstein world in her younger days.
Looks like Christian is saying Prince Andrew is
going to give up his Dukedom and Royal Status.
Before the public campaign starts to have it removed.
So he'll lose his Royal Status.
Mmmm. And his right to succession of the English Throne.
Mind you, he's a long way down the list of succession.
What I wonder is. Does this mean those Royal hangers on, Beatrice and Eugenie lose
their Royal Status too?
Mmmm. The sins of the father. As they say.
And please God lets hope, if he loses his Dukedom. Sarah Ferguson will not be able to refer to herself as the Duchess of York. Anymore.
Duchess and Duke is quite a high rank. Very high.
Sarah Ferguson will do anything not to lose that. For her. Or her daughter's.
They all sat back and didn't care. Some even laughed when Prince Charles insisted and succeeded in taking the, 'Her Royal Highness' HRH status from Princess Diana.
Which upset her badly.
Well. Are they sitting back laughing and not caring now?
No.
Funny how the universe makes some people eat shit. Their own.
And he can do this posthumously. When he is King.
And he will.
Paul Burrell, Lady Diana's personal butler, said the sight of his mother crying all afternoon about that spiteful move of Charles, to take her HRH Status.
Caused Prince William to hug his mother and say .... vow he will give it back. When he is King.
Sometimes I think Prince William is still that little boy. And an angry one.
He certainly despises the Press.
Perhaps his target now. Is Prince Andrew.
They forget Prince William will be King in the not too distant future.
Cause I think Prince Charles has health problems. And won't be King for long.
First off, why is the letter signed "Andrew" but not HRH Prince Andrew, Duke if York?
Second d, why did Andrew socialize with Epstein AFTER Epstein became a registered sex offender in over half of the states in America?
Third, does that statement feel organic to you? For me, the statement comes across as cold, clinical and manufactured.
Jeffrey Epstein’s talent-agent pal spotted scouting ‘fresh flesh’ in Brazil before Epstein arrest
FROM THE ARTICLE
Three months before FBI agents arrested Jeffrey Epstein at a private New Jersey airport for his alleged role in a global child trafficking ring, his old pal and business partner Jean Luc Brunel was busy scouring Brazil for girls who could make him even richer.
Brunel, 72, an agent who in the 1980s discovered some of the biggest names in modeling — Christy Turlington and Angie Everhardt — was on a month-long scouting jaunt, crisscrossing the South American nation for the next big thing.
https://nypost.com/2019/08/24/jeffrey-epsteins-talent-agent-pal-spotted-scouting-fresh-flesh-in-brazil-before-epstein-arrest/amp/
I am loving what you said about the universe making people eat their own $h!t.
I hope so.
Yes. It's true isnt? That the universe has a special way of making evil or unkind people eat their own shit.
Eventually.
I think Prince Andrew signing it as Andrew is his attempt of coming across as familiar and informal to the public.
An attempt at seeming sincere.
Not successful. Cause it's a pack of lies.
The cold clinical feeling through the letter too... is just an example of the formality and politness
of how UK peoole communicate.
Would seem rather stiff and officious to alot of people.
However, it's quite extreme. Because he's a Royal. Plus there's no way he even devised the letter. His private Secretary or a Palace Official would have wrote it. And got him to sign it.
Or the Monarchy's lawyers wrote it.
Chicks loved your karma reference. I do hope he loses all his benefits. He can deny but we know the truth.
Apple Monkey x
I meant to say models are pimped out, but pumped out works too.
So Prince Andrew revels in the fact his daughters ended up with Royal Status. Mmmmmm. Interesting.
Jeez I do hope they lose it.
As you know, in the Elizabethan times, Queen Elizabeth the 1st. And during the reigns of Kings like King Henry the 8th. If someone with a Royal or Noble title then disgraced him or herself.
They lost their title.
But also so did everyone else in the family. At the same time.
And even further, all their assets were taken by the crown. Mansions, farms, Jewellery.
This happened in France too.
And was even worse if your father was a Duke, Count, Earl, and your father was executed for treason.
Even being locked up in the tower of London caused this to happen to aristocratic families.
There is a movie with actress, Hilary Swank in it. That describes this common historical event. Perfectly.
It's a 2001 movie called The Affair of The Necklace.
It tells, among other things, the true story of what a young woman, Jeanne De Valois did to try and re-claim her Noble Title.
Taken from her family when she was a kid. And her parents executed.
x
Some people can be too nice. Then I get suspicious. They want something.
Lol TW you make me giggle! I am the same!
Although the film does contain a few historical accuracies, unfortunately, the writers took artistic liberties with the truth, (as an example she was not taken from her parents as a child, and her parents were not executed for treason). The film portrays Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, who was an impoverished descendant of the Valois royal family through an illegitimate son of King Henry II, as some sort of freedom fighter whose family had been deeply wronged by the crown. This is not the case. After her father’s Valois ancestry was ascertained by a genealogist at Versailles, as a result of legal dispositions set up to help children from poor nobility, her father who was a drunkard was granted a yearly stipend of 1000 pounds and a post in a military academy; the Crown also gave Jeanne and her sister Marie-Anne went to a boarding school in Passy a stipend of 900 pounds. It is such a shame that they chose to do this as the genuine story of Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy is far more interesting.
Jeanne was, in fact, a notorious French adventuress and thief who was highly promiscuous (as most French people were in those days) unashamedly brazen, very smart and witty. Jeane was more obsessed with the monetary rights she should have had as a (distant) relative of the king, not honour or retribution for wrongs (unless those retributions took the form of cash). When it became clear that her husband Nicolas was unable to meet the couple's financial needs to maintain them in the extravagant style that Jeanne avidly desired, Jeanne as a direct descendant of the Valois royal family resolved to ask for a more generous pension from the royal family due to her royal blood.
It is ironic that her greed in wanting to get a better pension from the Crown to fund her lavish lifestyle, her prominent role in the Affair of the Diamond Necklace, one of many scandals that led to the French Revolution and helped to destroy the monarchy of France.
Further reading for anyone that is interested …
Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanne_de_Valois-Saint-R%C3%A9my
Affair of the Diamond Necklace
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affair_of_the_Diamond_Necklace
The affair of the diamond necklace: Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, Comtesse de la Motte (1756-1791)
http://thelondondead.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-affair-of-diamond-necklace-jeanne.html
Curious that the statement released to the general public has not been personally signed by the Duke of York. I would assume a statement of such historical importance would bear the handwritten signature of the Prince. It is also very interesting that this (alleged) debauched man, who has lived an (alleged) hedonistic double life for decades, a man who is often described as an arrogant, self-centred bully who consistently flaunts his royal status at every opportunity he can, would just simply sign this important statement as ‘Andrew’ and not refer to the many royal titles he owns.
I feel for the sake of the future of the Monarchy Prince Andrew will be ‘protected’ to a certain degree by the establishment and I think some ‘revelations/stories’ will be buried. However, on saying that this diabolical and disgusting situation is not going to go away for Prince Andrew, nor can the palace fully brush this under their red carpet.
With regards to Prince Andrew’s future, he may be the Queen's favourite son, but he is certainly not the future Kings favourite brother. Prince Charles has made it perfectly clear in the past, and he has not been overruled by the Monarch, that he has no place for Andrew and his daughters in his court and following this there really is no way back for Prince Andrew. How can this man represent our country now?
If the Palace or he believes a rekindled romance with his ex-wife will distract the public from this then more fool them.
I have never seen the film. I don't watch many movies.
I have no problem with dramatic/artistic license as long as the truth of the story is not compromised. Sounds like the truth got compromised here. People are more likely to remember what they saw in a film than what they read in a book. Social engineering at its finest.
How many children does she have, I hear she has 3 sons and Princess Anne.
Things must be bad if Prince Charles will banish Prince Andrew and his offspring from his court. I still believe Charles will never become king.
A while back I posted a dream I had of Prince William. I thought the dream was telling me his life is in danger. As time passes, I think the dream means that his current life has to die in order for him to be crowned king. Remember, I dreamed Duchess Catherine was crowned Queen. That is not the norm as she would be considered Royal Consort, or Queen Regent if William dies and Prince George was still a minor. That is another reason why I thought Prince William was going to die.
No. I didnt know the back story to Jeanne de Valois Saint Remy. Omg So Interesting. So she wasn't the victim Hollywood portrayed?
I should have realised. Given the role she played in scamming with that fake necklace proposed for Marie Antoinette. Who does that kind of thing?
I agree. The real story of her is so much more interesting.
But i didn't know it.
I do wish Hollywood would stop making historical based movies with clear total inaccuracies. What is wrong with these directors. People can handle historical truth.
It annoys me so much. I went to see Mary Queen Of Scots movie, with Saoirise Ronan starring in it.
Almost the entire way through it I had to say to my cousin who went with me ' nah that never happened.'
The Affair Of The Necklace is a fantastic little movie as you know. The costumes were bang on correct. Everything except the story it appears.
This is so disappointing. And for actress, Hilary Swank.
So did they shave her head and whip Jeanne de Valois Saint Remy in prison for what she did Jules? Or is that hollywood fiction too?
You know, I watched this movie twice...cause I love the era its set. And the scenery. I remember I did a small amount of research after the movie to find out what ultimately happened to her. Cause after the French Revolution Jeanne de Valois Saint Remy was still young.
Seems 2 years before Marie Antoinette's execution. Jeanne de Valois Saint Remy became an author at 35. And went on speaking tours about her role in contributing to the downfall of Marie Antoinette.
Unfortunately she chose a speaking tour in London. And supposedly 'fell out' of a London hotel window. It's very unlikely she fell. The theory is that she was pushed out of the window. Murdered by French aristocracy.... who as you know, had to flee in great numbers to the U.K to escape the guillotine.
Strangely she was buried in Lambeth.
I'd say the British aristocracy would have willingly contributed to the assassin's bill. They were horrified as you know by the French Revolution.
So its clear. What you say. It was all about greed for Jeanne De Valois Saint Remy. And her not valuing the generous Royal stipend she already had the good fortune to get in the 1st place. Unbelievable ingratitude.
No wonder the French Refugees arranged her murder.
Rich English people would have been outraged at her nerve to come to the U.K and boast about her scam with that necklace.
I'm glad im not the only one batty about that film. And Jeanne De Valois Saint Remy.
I forgot she had that Saint Remy addition to her title. They refer to her as Jeanne de la Motte consistently...alot in the movie. As far as I know that was her married name.
Did you notice how much Hollywood lied in the story line of the movie The Duchess. About Georgiana , the Duchess of Devonshire?
It infuriated me. European governments should prohibit movie history revisionists. Prosecute the directors.
I think your prophetic dreams have accuracy.
Agree. Recovery from this fact based scandal is not gonna restore Prince Andrew's reputation.
Dear Koo Stark. His former gf will be there to support him through it. She claims they never lost touch or their friendship.
And not only as you say, Prince Charles won't have him at Court. Neither will William.
I get the strong impression Prince William is disgusted in these revelations about his uncle Prince Andrew.
Yes. Hes probably now referring to him as Uncle Dysfunctional these days. Or the Pervy Prince. He's definately a nonce of some sort.
And agree. Re- Marrying that village idiot Sarah Ferguson is not going to fix public perception.
Because the public don't like her either... generally.
I think he didn't sign that letter. Because if he's found guilty by a court. He may be charged with perjury or something as well.
It would be good if Christian could predict if Prince Andrew is gonna get away with this.
Losing his Royal Status will be catastrophic for him as it is. And if he's no longer Royal. He won't be at Court or the Palace very often.
Prince William will not want Prince Andrew around his daughter, Charlotte....as she grows up anyway.
And agree, the Meghan Markle sex tape or info is going to come out. Eventually. No doubt. And the Royal Family have that to contend with....that debacle in future. As well.
Some psychics say eventually, Meghan pays hush money to Prince Harry's ex girlfriends who have stories.
But she'd have to come up with a huge amount of money to shut up newspapers up about Meghan's time as a 'Yacht' girl. Cause those stories will be highly lucrative to all newspapers.
I don't think payin dirty money to angry ex's fitted in with Meghan's dream of being a princess.
Her problem is... She has too much of a history and baggage to ever have a peaceful life as a Royal.
As a female Royal. You have to come from an authentically squeaky clean upper class background to make it as a high ranking Royal.
Some people may argue with this, but Kate Middleton has that 'clean' background. Despite being a commoner.
FROM THE ARTICLE
According to The Guardian, Virginia gave a brief statement yesterday following a court proceeding in Manhattan. Virginia is the woman who appears in the now infamous photo where she’s seen standing next to Andrew, his greedy little fingers around her waist, while Epstein’s alleged accomplice (and reported frequent Palace guest) Ghislaine Maxwell leers in the background looking like a proud mama pimp.
https://dlisted.com/2019/08/28/prince-andrews-accuser-made-a-brief-and-succinct-statement-he-knows-what-hes-done/
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1166724380061290496
Royal has previously denied Virginia Giuffre’s accusation that she was forced to have sex with him
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/27/prince-andrew-virginia-giuffre-epstein-accuser
Can you believe. They are now tryin to claim that pic of very young Virginia Guiffre with Prince Andrew with his hand around her waist is fake.
But nope. The Daily Mail ain’t havin it. And have disputed that lie immediately tonight. Prince Andrew and all his enablers do not have all the Press on their side in this.
In fact, quite the opposite.
Prince Andrew is a creepy old liar. And Prince William’s Uncle Dysfunctional.
Prince Andrew needs to be shipped off to Timbuktu or somewhere. And never seen again.
Jail would be preferable though.
As to why Andrew is the Queen's favourite, I have no idea .. perhaps how they were raised .. a royal biographer Ben Pimlott wrote in his 1996 biography of Her Majesty stating the Queen was “a less natural mother with Charles and Anne… whereas she was much more the besotted parent with Andrew and Edward” Interestingly there are those who truly believe Andrew is not the Duke of Edinburgh’s son, they believe he is the son of Lord Porchester.
Charles and Andrew have never really gotten along. There are many who believe the core of the problem between both the two brothers stems from Andrews behaviour because he is the Queen's favourite, Andrew behaves like he is the heir to the throne.
Charles (allegedly) also believes Andrew has always been an embarrassment to the Monarchy - he has – Andrews behaviour has always been highly questionable. Charles is rumoured to be very aware that the monarchy is a precarious institution that needs to be very mindful of how it looks to the public and how they use the privilege that they have.
Charles is said to be livid by recent events. Charles is well aware of the damage this has done to the reputation of the Royal Family at home and abroad.
When Charles, at the request of the Queen, took control over the Royal family and decided who did what during the Queens Diamond Jubilee he famously excluding all his siblings from the 2012 balcony appearance. In fact, the only members of the family who appeared on the balcony with Her Majesty that day were Charles, Camilla Parker Bowles, Prince William, Kate Middleton, and Prince Harry. Several reports have claimed that when Charles becomes king, he has plans to “slim down the monarchy,” meaning that only he and his immediate family would be funded by taxpayers. These reports have Andrew so worried (the public funding to himself and his daughters would be stopped) he wrote a letter to the queen requesting that both Eugenie and Beatrice receive full-time royal duties like their cousins, William and Harry. The Queen, to Andrews astonishment, did not overrule Charles decision.
When Charles later cemented his grip on the actual levers of power in his 2016 coup, when he forced the ouster of the Queen’s personal private secretary (PPS) Sir Christopher Geidt, which left him and his own PPS, Clive Alderton, in a commanding position behind palace walls Charles has sought to reinforce at every opportunity the notion that Andrew and his family are very minor and peripheral figures in the royal soap opera. Charles’ wife, Camilla, did not even attend Andrew’s daughter’s wedding last year. The excuse—that she was busy entertaining guests at her home in Scotland—appeared calculated to belittle the Yorks, and such a public snub would certainly not have been offered without Charles’ blessing.
This ‘circus’ created by the Duke of York is getting ridiculous. Buckingham Palace stating last week that Prince Andrew would be willing to help authorities on both sides of the Atlantic if approached – if approached? An innocent man would have stepped forward when this first surfaced years ago to clear his name and he would have had no problems whatsoever willingly …… without being asked … stepping forward and helping the investigating authorities.
An innocent man does not stay silent. Every response he has given to this story has made him look worse. This will only end with him answering questions put to him by lawyers and yet he is still stalling.
https://blindgossip.com/isle-combover-and-liar/
Yes. The York's. Eugenie and Beatrice, Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew are minor Royals. And yet....they have pushed and pushed to be front and center. For decades.
For this reason I can't stand them.
From what you say. Prince Charles is fully aware of it. And in control of it. Good.
But can he revoke Eugenie and Beatrice's Royal Status and funds they get from it?
Hope so. They are a drain on Royal Funds.
Why on earth did Eugenie get married at Windsor Chapel?
Well... she found out Meghan was marrying there.
That would have been too much for die hard snob Sarah Ferguson...a biracial American marrying Harry there.
And not Eugenie.
Sarah Ferguson would campaigned for that Wedding Venue.
I have seen the reports.
One American outlet claims a source said those aren't Andrew's hands in the pic. The source said Andrew's fingers are shorter and chubby. The source also says Andrew's fingers aren't red.
The news outlet needs to get some common sense and to put thought to skull.
1) Prince Andrew has gained much weight since that pic was taken. That can make your fingers chubby and appear shorter.
2) His hands were red because he was caught red handed. Both literally & figuratively.
This is juicy!
Charles and Anne look like The Queen. Andrew looks like no one. Edward looks like no one too.
Eugenie and Beatrice look like men.
We never hear about Edward. Perhaps he is a normal person with a happy, normal life?
I'm glad to read Charles has a backbone. I wonder if Camilla had a hand in all of this? According to American tabloids, she is the master of plots and schemes. They always make her look horrid. But I tell you what. Americans love Camilla.
I wonder if Charles would be good for the monarchy if he becomes king? Maybe he knows The Queen prefers Prince William to succeed her and he is doing all he can to help his son.
Anyone with half a brain can read between those lines. Andrew is guilty and knows he will get into more trouble if he voluntarily discloses what he knows.
By the way. The authorities should use his statement to compel him to come forward.
Ordinarily he would be compelled to talk to the Met Police or Scotland Yard.
But he's a Royal. So he and his little fat Red hands are being protected.
This is a huge scandal for the British.
Probably the worst since they discovered old desd Prince Edward was a balls out Nazi during WW2.
They are in damage control at the moment.
Oh and as for the current living Prince Edward. There was alot of concern in the 80's and 90's he was gay.
People used to actually worry about that shit then.
But quietly.
Anyway. It was cause he was running around alot in theatre. Wearing tights on stage.
Theatre as an activity was seen as effeminate.
He even developed his own Film Production company as I recall. Called Ardent.
And then he married that snobby villainous Sophie Rhys Jones, now Sophie of Wessex.
They tried to force Prince Edward to join the Marines after university. He did.
How the Royal family believed a tights wearing Theatre enthusiast like Prince Edward would survive as a Marine is mind boggling.
Needless to say he dropped out of the Commando Course... pretty quickly. Or was more probably booted out. They are ruthless as you know. They have to be.
It was clearly Prince Phillip's, his father's dumb idea to force him into the UK Marines.
As Prince Phillip is batty about the glorification of violence. And extreme macho activities. He's an ex Navy man.
And there's something odd about Lady Louise, Prince Edwards daughter.
Personally I think she is autistic. Not just eye/vision issues.
And the Royal family are currently doing a successful cover up of the disability.
That Family is nothing but a bunch of inbred, demon possessed losers living off British taxpayers.
As a child, Prince Charles was severely bullied at home, (by his father and sister Anne) and whilst at school. Nowadays, however, Charles is said to be formidable. There are also growing rumours that he has stopped financially supporting his youngest son and his wife. Apparently, his office was inundated with letters from the general public asking him to do so.
Prince Edward is said to be the Duke of Edinburgh’s favourite son. It is thought that he will be given the title of Duke of Edinburgh upon his father’s death, hence the reason why he was only given the title of Earl, by tradition, male children of the sovereign receive a Dukedom on their wedding day. It is said that Edward chose that title of Earl of Wessex because of its connotations with one of Edward’s favourite films, Shakespeare In Love, in it featured a character with the title of Earl Of Wessex.
Prince Edward was allegedly as arrogant as Andrew was, marriage and becoming a father has apparently changed him. He is said to be a hands-on parent .. more so than his wife .. who is said to be cold and strict with her children. The Royal couple is financially supported by the Queen, although all expenses from any royal duties they undertake are paid for by the British taxpayer.
When Sophie, Prince Edwards wife, the Countess of Wessex, first appeared on the scene and had a haircut, members of the press much to Sophie's delight began to physically compare her with Princess Diana, she did not look like the Princess of Wales at all, the only comparison was Sophie had a similar hairstyle to the Princess.
They are not ‘scandal’ free.
They both ran companies that went bankrupt. Edwards company, established in 1993, Ardent ran up £2million of debts before folding ten years later. It survived that long thanks to the indulgence of a few wealthy businessmen. Sophie, who once declared her ambition to be the first senior Royal to be commercially successful, company RJ-H PR, set up by the Countess of Wessex and former business partner Murray Harkin, was wound up, leaving more than £1.7million of debts.
There was also the infamous ‘Sophie Gate’ when Sophie was duped by the notorious ‘Fake Sheik’, who secretly recorded her making indiscreet comments about public figures (she said William Hague’s face was ‘all wrong’ and Cherie Blair was ‘even worse’ than her husband). Worst of all, she, just like Sarah Ferguson did traded on her Royal connections.
I understand why you think the way you do in regards to Lady Louise, who was born with esotropia, a condition that turns the eyes outwards, I think if the Countess of Wessex dressed her daughter differently over the years perceptions of her daughter would be different.
Yes, Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy was ordered to be flogged and branded, which was the punishment at the time in France for thieves, and she was sentenced to ‘life’ imprisonment. However, the speech she gave in the movie in front of the Judges etc never happened at all. French courts were not run like English and American courts back then.
Jeanne escaped the Salpêtrière notorious Parisian prison for prostitutes where she was sent after six years. How she escaped was written in her memoirs, although historians doubt her explanation, and have deemed it a highly improbable account of how she managed to escape her Parisian jail. She claims well-wishers smuggled writing materials to her with which she produced a sketch of the key to her cell (which she merely managed to snatch glimpses of in the hands of the nuns who served as jailers), the sketch was then smuggled out of the prison and used to make a duplicate key which was smuggled back in along with a men’s clothes. When the opportunity arose Jean donned the suit and wig and let herself out of her cell and a further three locked doors and escaped from the prison by mingling amongst a crowd of sightseers on a visit to see the locked up prostitutes. Once free she made her way to Luxembourg and then to London where she was joined by her husband. In London, she wrote her bestselling “Memoires Justificatifs de La Comtesse de Valois de La Motte,” but seemed to make very little money from them, if she was forced to live in a common lodging-house in Lambeth and died being dunned for a mere £30.
There is a lot of speculation regarding her death .. but one thing is for certain she was being chased by two heavily built men (bailiffs) … and was reported to have ‘flown’ from a third storey window, striking a tree on the way down. It is impossible to say if she fell, jumped, was pushed or was even thrown out of the window but it is clear she was badly injured; she seems to have broken more than one limb and she has lost an eye.
In the days that follow the newspapers explain what happened; this is the report taken from the Caledonian Mercury 9 June 1791
“A female foreigner, who lodged in the neighbourhood of Mount-row, Lambeth, being on Monday night arrested upon an action for a trifling sum of money, was so much affected, that she leaped out of a two pair of stairs window, by which act the broke both her legs, and was otherwise so much bruised, that her life is despaired of. She proves to be the famous Comtesse de !a Mott. As soon as the Bailiffs arrested her, she asked them to drink a glass of wine, and, on pretence of getting it, left the room, and immediately locked the door. From the window they saw her go into an adjoining house, and pursued her. She lies terribly mangled; her left eye cut out — one of her arms and both her legs are broken.”
Jeanne took two and a half months to die of her injuries, finally expiring on the 21 August, reportedly after over indulging in mulberries for which she had a particular weakness ( one wonders if she was poisoned?
I don’t think for a single second Eugenie chose to get married at St Georges Chapel in Windsor Castle to upstage her cousin Prince Harry or because her mother wanted her to get married there because Harry married a ‘ biracial American’ Eugenie has attended services, including other royal weddings at St Georges chapel throughout her entire life. I think if her mother had her say she would have chosen Westminster Abbey, where she was married and her cousin Prince William was married.
Thank you for sharing all of this.
1) That Jeanne person sounds like Kim Kardashian. I doubt her account of her jailbreak too.
2) Prince Edward and his wife sound inept. I wonder if he married that woman for love.
3) Who bullies their own kid?
4) I can understand Prince Charles better now. He strikes me as being an introvert.
5) I know Prince Charles likes to garden and such. If he were not royal I can see him having a career in agriculture.
I agree with TW. And you. Jeanne de Valois Saint Remy was up there with Kim Kardashian. I read an article the other night that compared Jeanne de Valois Saint Remy, as someone who planned scams and heists equal to Oceans Eleven.
I had a giggle about that. Cause it's clearly true. And I've seen the Oceans Eleven films. So it rings true to me.
Yes. The Affair Of The Necklace movie so didn't give justice to that cunning jeanne de Valois clearly had. They made out she was forced into Oceans Eleven acts of theft. And fraud. Through misfortune.
Nope. But sounds like she did hit hard times later in life.
And now I know the details. I agree.... her jail break story she claimed is not very plausible.
And they had every reason to bump her off with poisoned mulberries. In fact it's astounding she lived as long as she did. Considering the chaos she caused in France.
Really hope that movie is remade. I'll watch it twice.
As for Lady Louise. I didnt know the eye problem. Was the only problem. But explains alot.
But yes. Her mother has been dressing Lady Louise like someone in a 1950's Time Warp.
She's 15. At 15 your mother usually isnt havin anything to do with your clothes choices by then.
At 15, she ordinarily would be rockin the latest fashions...a conservative version of them at least.
But what do the public continually see her in?
Clothes I'm sure 1950's librarians wore to work.
It's not normal. As you say... it's kinda distorting public perception of that kid. And making them think there is something profoundly wrong.
Oh and I forgot about Sophie of Wessex's 'fake Sheik' gaffe. She seemed to live that down far too easily. But seems she learned from it.
Sarah Ferguson never learns.
And I agree in your observation. Absolutely right. Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, would have definately insisted her daughter marry at Westminster Abbey. If she thought she could have swung it.
She probably tried. Despite the fact it's against the rules. A low ranking Royal like her daughter marrying there.
Yes. Prince Charles is obsessed in gardening. Lady Diana used to find it evidence that he was mad. That he used to talk to his plants.
Prince Charles has always been a ahead of his time Environmentalist.
He should be the UK's minister for all Green issues.
If Prince Charles has stopped financially supporting Prince Harry and Meghan then I think that's fair.
It explains why they are going down the occupational line... of paid appearances.
Which is not a good pathway either for a Royal.
But I think Prince Harry's circumstances can be described very well by an 80's song by The Smiths.
English people will know it by its genius opening lyric...
' I am the son. And the heir. Of nothing in particular'.
Haven’t you heard? Women are perpetual victims who are in constant need of rescue...
She looks plain to me but then again look at her parents. Prince Edward looks like The Queen and Prince Andrew to me.
As for her clothes, I like them. But as you pointed out the girl is 15 years old. At least she isn’t wearing crop tops and bitty shorts. She could be dressing like Miley Cyrus.
There’s several legitimate scientific studies showing plants and water can hear and that they respond to music and to the spoken word.
This is important when you consider the human body is over 80 percent water.
A Japanese researcher published a book about his studies on water and rice. If you say nice things to water such as “I love you” the water will form beautiful ice crystals when frozen.
If you tell water I hate you or You are ugly, then the water will freeze into shards instead of beautiful crystals.
He put rice in water and spoke to it. The blessed rice stayed clean several days later. The cursed rice turned black and moldy.
Don’t get me started on heavy metal music and plants.
The Bible does say life and death are in the power of the tongue. Every time God wanted something done He would speak it into existence.