- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Labels:
. tyk-tyk.germany cnn msnbc thesun skynews bbc itv sunday people russia trump russia putin spy WEIBO
.new.york.tmz. Whitehouse
mike pence
vp
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Alexandra Grant. More lies? Did she forget she married another person 10 years ago... & is still married... UPDATE...
I had a dream about Alexandra Grant. (Which in it's self is disturbing) This is what I saw in the dream. I SAW... Alexandra Grant is married. Not to Keanu Reeves. T he marriage took place around 9/10 years ago on the East coast of America. (Not New York City) I Saw She was in a very close relationship with this "Person" I See she was paid to do this... The person she is married to is of dubious character... This person has been "Away" for quite a while... (If you know what I mean) This person is threatening to return.. She will... To expose the marriage & other criminal behaviors they both had a part in. As I write this. Keanu Reeves & his team. Do not know of this. Alexandra, knows is still legally married. Has her head in the sand. Hoping it will go away... STAY TUNED... MORE TO COME...
Comments
I guess Pence is one of them Christians that believes The Illuminati and other secret societies are myths.
You’d think he would know better because he has been involved in politics for a while.
Perhaps THEY have been keeping Pence outside of THEIR circles.
He’s about to find out the difference between fact and theory.
Is the English King, Charles I .....watching and supporting Trump in spirit at the moment ? I'm referring to the English King who got his head cut off.
Trump has everything in common with doomed English King, Charles I at present.
And here is the reason why.
The founders of the U.S Impeachment process focussed on the design of the U.S Impeachment process as being a political process. Rather than just a basically legal.
Or technical one.
According to the New York Times today there is no actual definition in the Impeachment Constitution that gives definitions of for example, assault, or embezzlement. As in a legal way.
But there is a description in it for a President 'seeking foreign interference in domestic politics for personal gain'.
This inclusion in the Impeachment wording has brought Trump way closer to impeachment than previous U.S leaders.
Previous U.S leaders almost impeached were Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon.
And Andrew Johnson of the 1800's
All were impeached but did not resign.
And here is where the English King, Charles I comes into the whole thing with Trump.
They have alot in common.
The U.S Impeachment Constitution was designed by founders and based around a political event in English History. Not America's.
In 1649, the English House Of Commons impeached King Charles I.
For Treason.
He was alleged to have subverted English democracy and colluded with foreign adversaries. In his campaigns against his rivals.
Sound familiar guys?
And as a lot know, King Charles I had his head chopped off the same year, for it, in 1649
Trump won't get his head chopped off.
But it's more more likely he will resign.
Impeachment does not remove elected officials from office. Think of it as a grand jury proceeding: Do we have enough evidence to take this person to trial? For a more detailed explanation, please go here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States
/////////
Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton are the only US Presidents that have been impeached. Neither of them were removed from office.
President Richard Nixon resigned before impeachment proceedings took place. I was not alive when Nixon was president but I heard there was a nefarious reason people wanted Nixon out of office and Nixon resigned to prevent a secret government operation from being made public. If Christian has any insight into this I would love to hear it.
///////
This is an excerpt from a Wikipedia article that should help people understand why a person holding political office can be impeached:
Congress has identified three general types of conduct that constitute grounds for impeachment, although these categories should not be understood as exhaustive:
(1) improperly exceeding or abusing the powers of the office;
(2) behavior incompatible with the function and purpose of the office; and
(3) misusing the office for an improper purpose or for personal gain.
Conversely, not all criminal conduct is impeachable: in 1974, the Judiciary Committee rejected an article of impeachment against President Nixon alleging that he committed tax fraud, primarily because that "related to the President's private conduct, not to an abuse of his authority as President."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States
Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson were not almost impeached. They were impeached.
Impeachment proceedings are inquiries, not the actual removal of elected officials.
If the official does not survive impeachment, the matter goes to trial.
Nixon resigned before he was impeached. Rumor has it he chose to resign so he could protect a secret give operation that was benefitting the American people.
Lots of fighting over love religion.
Check this out. He was the son of King James 1, the king who commissioned the Holy Bible to be translated into English.
King Charles 1 was not trusted by the English because he was pro-Roman Catholic Protestant married to a French Catholic. Keep in mind his father was Protestant and his grandmother was Roman Catholic.
King James 1 of Britain was the son of Mary, Queen of Scots. She was Queen Elizabeth 1’s cousin. Mary was forced to abdicate and her son James was crowned king. The story behind all this is interesting, I will post a link.
Mary was crowned Queen of Scots when she was 6 days old so her mother had to rule as Queen Regent for a while.
Seems she and her son Charles made decisions that cost them their heads.
Mary Queen of Scots was executed for allegedly plotting to kill Queen Elizabeth 1. There is no proof that Mary wanted to take her place and the fact Queen Elizabeth 1 took her time to sign the death warrant is telling.
Wikipedia has no chill. Look at what they have to say about King Charles 1:
He had an elder brother, Henry, who was clever, handsome, popular, and rich, and next in line for the throne. Henry died suddenly in 1612, and his brother Charles was made Prince of Wales in his place, showing that he was now the heir to the throne. Charles was less suited to be king than Henry had been, because he was small and weak and not as clever.
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_I_of_England
Link - Mary, Queen of Scots
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary,_Queen_of_Scots
Is Trump gonna suspend Congress to avoid impeachment?
Find out in the next episode of “Only in America”!
Yes. Charles I is a very interesting character. Especially with how things are going on in the U.S right now.