Alexandra Grant. More lies? Did she forget she married another person 10 years ago... & is still married... UPDATE...
I had a dream about Alexandra Grant. (Which in it's self is disturbing) This is what I saw in the dream. I SAW... Alexandra Grant is married. Not to Keanu Reeves. T he marriage took place around 9/10 years ago on the East coast of America. (Not New York City) I Saw She was in a very close relationship with this "Person" I See she was paid to do this... The person she is married to is of dubious character... This person has been "Away" for quite a while... (If you know what I mean) This person is threatening to return.. She will... To expose the marriage & other criminal behaviors they both had a part in. As I write this. Keanu Reeves & his team. Do not know of this. Alexandra, knows is still legally married. Has her head in the sand. Hoping it will go away... STAY TUNED... MORE TO ...
Comments
When this is all over.
I mean how could he possibly, as a member of the upper hierarchy of the U S legal system get away with so much.
In such a public way ....it beggars belief.
There's no way he would have got away with his behavior in Australia.
We'd have him strung up by his ankles on some beach rather quickly.
And the media here would carve him up for dinner too.
Australia doesn't like what they call 'tall poppies' who think they are above the law.
I think that's why Australian billionaire, Gina Rhinehart, the mining and environmental destroyer is so unpopular here.
And
She doesn't even live in Australia.
Nor talk like one.
She talks like she was born into English aristocracy.
As far as I know. She spent alot of her childhood growing up in the Australian desert. Or going to Australian boarding school.
Perhaps that's why she doesn't live here.
Quite disliked.
I preferred her father, Lang Hancock. At least he saw himself as an Australian. And actually lived here.
Chick's Opinion - I remember the treatment Gina gave Rose Hancock Porteous - not that she was totally blameless. I was like a soap opera - better viewing than Dynasty in those days.
I missed the Rose Hancock/Porteous saga.
It wasn't reported in the UK. I only learned of it about 6 years when I was reading No Idea magazine or something similar. I occasionly used to read those magazines when I wanted something lighter.
Yes. Rose Hancock was the most shameless golddigger hey.
What was Lang Hancock thinkin?
I saw a doco on ABC on Mining Magnate Gina Rinehart. And she acted very swiftly and strategically when her father Lang Hancock was dyin in hospital and he finally realised Rose was fooling around with someone else.
Gina was talking to her father, Lang on his bedside phone from the U.S
So she asked her father, 'so do you feel you want to change your Will dad?'
And he said 'yes'.
So in an hour she had phoned their Australian lawyers and had them at Lang's hospital bedside to change his Will immediately.
I agree though how Gina Rinehart did everything she could to stop long term ....her greedy spoilt adult children gettin at the Trust Lang set up for them.
I mean the adult children of hers.... that took her to court to get control over that Trust. Gina wanted them shut off from it till 2068.
Because according to her, they have had so much money already. And should get jobs.
Lang Hancock never wanted to set up the Trust for Gina's kids in the first place. And she regrets bitterly that she didn't listen to her father.
He actually said to her 'you will rue the day you ever chose to do it'
Well how true is that.
And you probably know, greed infested Bianca Rinehart won her case against her mother Gina, with 2 other siblings who were part of the lawsuit. And she got access and control of the billions in the Trust.
Sad.
Because Gina Rinehart only has a relationship today with 1 of her children, called Ginia.
The one who refused to sue her mother.
Yes...you are right. It's straight out of a Dynasty Episode. Australian Dynasty.
For them too, it's too much and never enough.
Outdated and bad for the air.
And is he the generation who stop women progressing? to high operational positions.
Well his Gen is probably not the only generation keeping women down at the moment.
Because so few women get to CEO level.
Because they have kids and go part time...and despite how remarkably experienced and qualified they are. When they can only return to 3 days a week part time work after havin babies. They are completely shut out of the opportunity to move into CEO roles.
The research on this subject doesn't lie.
That's what happens.
And unfortunately women stay there.
In that 3 days a week bubble.
And miss career opportunities they deserve.
And who gets those opportunities?
Men.